Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

We can see diffraction of light if we allow light to pass through a slit, but why doesn't diffraction occur if we obstruct light using some other object, say a block? Why are shadows formed? Why doesn't light diffract around the obstruction as it does around the slit?

share|cite|improve this question
"Why doesn't light diffract around the obstruction as it does around the slit?". But it does. See for instance Babinet's principle – Trimok Aug 13 '13 at 11:07
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Light will diffract around anything, including a block. We simply don't observe this diffraction because most blocks are very large compared to the wavelength of light. One historically-famous example of diffraction around an object is Poisson's spot, in which diffraction around a circular disk is easily observed.

share|cite|improve this answer

Good question. Actually, early 19th century this question was put forward as an argument against diffraction theory.

The below is from :

enter image description here

"In 1818, Fresnel presented his theory explaining diffraction of light. Poisson denied the truth of the theory, and argued that a consequence of the theory would be that there would be a bright spot right in the middle of the shadow of a circular object. The spot, shown above of the shadow of a ball bearing suspended on a needle, was promptly discovered by Arago. This was a lot harder to do before lasers were invented!"

Note: observation of such diffraction patterns are best done in (nearly) monochromatic light. Hence the remark about using lasers. The bright spot at the center of a circular shadow is known as an Arago spot.

share|cite|improve this answer

Light diffracts through any object but the wavelength must be greater when compared to the size of the object. In this case it is slits so.

share|cite|improve this answer
Hi Nike, you have the start of a good answer here. You should expand it a bit to provide more details. – Brandon Enright Dec 2 '14 at 5:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.