Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The both sides of below equation don't give the same units, e.g. $$ \frac{\delta}{\delta \phi (\tau)}\int_a^b \phi (\tau') d\tau'=1\;. $$ where $a<\tau<b$. To show this assume that the field $\phi$ has "$j$" unit and $\tau$ has "$s$" unit then $$ [\frac{1}{j} j s] \neq [ 1 ]. $$ What's wrong with my reasoning?

share|improve this question
    
The identity looks wrong. Or maybe the $1$ in RHS is not dimensionless, i.e. It might be giving the value $1$ for some specific $\phi (\tau)$, which doesn't imply it is dimensionless. –  udiboy1209 Aug 8 '13 at 9:53
1  
Where did you find this equation? In what context? –  Ali Aug 8 '13 at 9:58
    
This equation I wrote as an example of more complex case. Especially I think that sometimes people forget about planck constant in the action $e^{-S/\hbar}$ but they don't forget about it in another places of the same given equation (when there is no assumption that $\hbar=1$). –  memat Aug 8 '13 at 10:06

1 Answer 1

Regardless of the context and the meaning of the symbols, both sides of the equation have perfectly the same units: they are dimensionless.

The integral has units $js$ as you write, using your notation, but the functional derivative has the compensating units $1/(js)$ so the units cancel.

To see that dimension of the functional derivative is $1/(js)$, one may use a more general "defining" identity for the functional derivatives $$ \frac{\delta}{\delta \phi(\tau)} \phi(\tau') = \delta(\tau-\tau') $$ which is the continuous-index counterpart of $\partial / \partial x_i (x_j) = \delta_i^j$. The units of the functional derivative would be just $1/j$ – canceling that of $\phi$ itself – if the delta-function on the right hand side were dimensionless, like the Kronecker delta. But it's not. The delta-function may be written as the $\tau$-derivative of the dimensionless step function (zero for negative arguments, one for positive arguments), so its units are $1/s$ (the inverse units to the units of the argument, in this case $\tau$), which means that the units of $\delta / \delta \phi(\tau)$ have an extra $1/s$ as well, to get the total units $1/(js)$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.