Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is precision a "quality" of a measurement?

Is there a better (accepted by the literature) word?

share|improve this question

closed as off topic by David Z Mar 21 '11 at 16:11

Questions on Physics Stack Exchange are expected to relate to physics within the scope defined by the community. Consider editing the question or leaving comments for improvement if you believe the question can be reworded to fit within the scope. Read more about reopening questions here.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
I imagine this will be a controversial closure - as always, I'm open to arguments for reopening, but before you comment, please read the comments on HDE's answer which clarify the meaning of the question. –  David Z Mar 21 '11 at 16:12
    
Quality is can be the measure of width of a Gaussian distribution. Given a series of measurements on the same condition, a distribution of errors will exist. The width of this distribution is the precision, which I wouldn't argue to also call quality in the above sense. The center of this distribution is the accuracy. Now I also wouldn't argue that an inaccurate measurement is of low quality, if accuracy was required. Barometric altimeters come to mind: they are wildly inaccurate due to changes in weather, but more precise than GPS. Quality is just not a good word metrology. –  Michael Jul 15 at 20:40
add comment

1 Answer 1

No, precision = detail, it's accuracy that could be related to quality (and it implies precision too)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accuracy_and_precision

share|improve this answer
1  
Ah, In German we call that "Wiederholgenauigkeit" that word is much more accurate and precise :=) –  Georg Mar 21 '11 at 13:14
    
@Georg is right, Repeatability is a condition for precision, then as it's very hard to repeat that long German word, perhaps it's not so precise :o) –  HDE Mar 21 '11 at 13:20
    
That's not what I meant. I'm asking what is "precision" to a measurement? Is it a "characteristic" of the measurement? Is it a "quality" of the measurement? I'm looking for the right word. I'm not saying that precision is related to the measurement quality. –  John Assymptoth Mar 21 '11 at 13:45
    
@HDE, You cant have the cake and eat it. As a matter of fact, contrary to popular wievs in general, German is more concise (and shorter) in Science, Technology and Philosophy. But nevertheless, the pun in my comment was unavoidable :=) –  Georg Mar 21 '11 at 14:27
1  
When exactly did this become thesaurus.se? –  wsc Mar 21 '11 at 16:13
show 3 more comments

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.