Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm sure many of us are familiar with the following plot showing the running of the inverse of the fine-structure constants of the SM.

running of SM couplings (I got the picture from google)

At one-loop, the expressions for the fine-structure constants of the hypercharge, weak, and color gauge groups are,

$$\frac{1}{\alpha_1 (\mu)} \approx 59 - \frac{41}{20 \pi}\log[\frac{\mu}{M_Z}]$$ $$\frac{1}{\alpha_2 (\mu)} \approx 30 + \frac{19}{12 \pi}\log[\frac{\mu}{M_Z}],$$ $$\frac{1}{\alpha_3 (\mu)} \approx 8.5 + \frac{7}{2 \pi}\log[\frac{\mu}{M_Z}],$$

where the numerical values of $\alpha$'s in the first terms in RHS are at the mass of the Z boson $M_Z$. Now, if I plot these (from $\mu=100$ GeV to $\mu=2\times 10^16$ GeV) using Mathematica, I get this:

enter image description here

The slopes of the $log$'s in the previous equations do not produce the shape appearing in the first plot.

What am I missing here? How is the first plot, which we usually see in the literature, produced?

Update: What I was missing is skills with Mathematica :p, Now I get the correct plot: enter image description here

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by dmckee Aug 6 '13 at 19:22

  • This question does not appear to be about physics within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Your plot doesn't pass a sniff test: The equation for the running of $\alpha_3$ is a line with a slope of roughly 1 and a $y$-intercept of 8.5. It should rise to about 25 by $\mu = 10^{16} M_Z$. Perhaps you're taking log twice? – user1504 Aug 6 '13 at 18:08
Yes you are right, I took it twice like any stupid would do.. I suspected I did something wrong in my plotting. Now I get the desired plot when I use the LogLogPlot function. Previously I used Plot, with the interval being from Log[MZ] to Log[10^16] so the log was taken twice. – stupidity Aug 6 '13 at 18:31
Or even better is the LogLinearPlot function which plots log scale on the x-axis only. – stupidity Aug 6 '13 at 18:47
You have to take care of the difference between $log_{10}$ units and $ln$ units. Your formulae are expressed in $ln$ units, but the graph uses $log_{10}$ units. Why $\alpha_3$ is not a straight line ? See test plot – Trimok Aug 6 '13 at 18:54
This question appears to be off-topic because it is about using a software tool. – dmckee Aug 6 '13 at 19:22