Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a question about the generalization of gauge transformation with two antisymmetric indices.

Starting from Eq. (3.7.6) in Polchinski's string theory book p. 108. $$S_{\sigma} = \frac{1}{4 \pi \alpha'} \int_M d^2 \sigma g^{1/2} \left[ \left( g^{ab} G_{\mu \nu}(X) + i \epsilon^{ab} B_{\mu \nu} (X) \right) \partial_a X^{\mu} \partial_b X^{\nu} + \alpha' R \Phi(X) \right] \tag{3.7.6} $$ where $B_{\mu \nu}(X)$ is the antisymmetric tensor.

It is said variation $$ \delta B_{\mu \nu} (X) = \partial_{\mu} \zeta_{\nu}(X) - \partial_{\nu} \zeta_{\mu}(X) \tag{3.7.7} $$ can add a total derivative to the Lagrangian density.

I tried to do some integration by part for $\partial_{\mu}$, $\partial_{\nu}$, $\partial_a$, and/or $\partial_b$ in (3.7.7), miserably I didn't get a total derivative.

My question is, how to see Eq. (3.7.7) gives a total derivative?

share|improve this question
2  
Skip disclaimer? –  user1504 Aug 5 '13 at 21:54
    
Yep. I often say "I have a stupid question" something like that, and joshphysics suggested that I don't have to use such "disclaimer", although i always feel uncomfortable for encountering so many problems during reading Polchinski >_< (now removed) physics.stackexchange.com/q/71928 –  user26143 Aug 5 '13 at 22:07
3  
I guess the next step is to remove the "remove disclaimer" at the beginning of your questions. You can do it! People who judge you for asking so many questions can...well you get the point. –  joshphysics Aug 5 '13 at 23:05
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 3 down vote accepted

The answer to this question is best understood in terms of differential forms.

Thanks to the antisymmetry of $B_{\mu\nu}$ and $\epsilon^{ab}$, the component $S_B = k \int_M \epsilon^{ab} B_{\mu\nu} \partial_a X^u \partial_b X^\nu$ of the action which contains $B$ can be written $S_B = k\int_M X^*B$, where $X: \mbox{M} \to \mbox{Spacetime}$ is the string's worldsheet and $B = B_{\mu\nu} dx^\mu \wedge dx^\nu$ is a 2-form on the target spacetime.

If $B = d\Lambda$ and the boundary $\partial M = \emptyset$, then $\int_M X^*B = \int_M X^*(d\Lambda) = \int_M d (X^*\Lambda) = \int_{\partial M} X^*\Lambda = 0$.

share|improve this answer
    
Does your "*" mean taking Hodge star on $B$? How does $X$ correspond to $\epsilon^{ab} \partial_a X^{\mu} \partial_b X^{\nu}$? –  user26143 Aug 6 '13 at 0:14
    
$*$ is the notation for pullback. $X^\mu$ is the pullback $X^*z^\mu$ of the $\mu$-th coordinate function $z^\mu$ on the target spacetime. $\partial_a X^\mu$ is the $a$-the component of the exterior derivative of $X^u$. –  user1504 Aug 6 '13 at 0:17
    
How to get the expression of $X^*$? is that $\epsilon^{ab} \partial_a X^{\mu} \partial_b X^{\nu}$ (I can get $B=B_{\mu \nu} dx^{\mu} \wedge dx^{\nu}$, but not other part between non-differential-form and differential-form of $S_B$)? And in your last equation, should $\int_M X^* (dB)$ be $\int_M X^* (d\Lambda)$? –  user26143 Aug 6 '13 at 1:01
    
Yep, that was typo. For the rest, you're going to have to spend a little time learning about forms. It will be time well spent, but it's not going to happen here in the comments. –  user1504 Aug 6 '13 at 1:55
    
I took a course on differential geometry, although i didn't done well. I think I need at least a reference for the techniques of pullback $X$ in the content of world sheet..(seems Nakahara's book is not directly useful here) –  user26143 Aug 6 '13 at 2:12
show 2 more comments

The variation of the Lagrangian density is :

$$\delta \mathbb L= i\epsilon^{ab} \partial_a X^\mu \partial_b X^\nu(\partial_{\mu} \zeta_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu} \zeta_{\mu}) \tag{1}$$

The chain rule for partial derivatives gives :

$$\partial_a \zeta_{\nu} = \partial_a X^\mu ~~\partial_{\mu} \zeta_{\nu}\tag{2}$$

and :

$$\partial_b \zeta_{\mu} = \partial_b X^\nu ~~\partial_{\nu} \zeta_{\mu}\tag{3}$$

Using $(2),(3)$ in $(1)$, we get :

$$\delta \mathbb L= i\epsilon^{ab}(\partial_b X^\nu~\partial_a \zeta_{\nu} -\partial_a X^\mu~\partial_b \zeta_{\mu})\tag{4}$$

$\epsilon^{ab}$ and the second term of the above equation are antisymmetric in $a,b$, so we could write :

$$\delta \mathbb L= 2i\epsilon^{ab}\partial_b X^\nu~\partial_a \zeta_{\nu}\tag{5}$$

With an integration by parts, we get :

$$\delta \mathbb L= 2i\epsilon^{ab}(\partial_b (X^\nu~\partial_a \zeta_{\nu}) - X^\nu~\partial_a \partial_b \zeta_{\nu})\tag{6}$$

The expression $\epsilon^{ab}\partial_a \partial_b \zeta_{\nu}$ vanishes, because of the antisymmetry of $\epsilon^{ab}$.

So, finally, we get :

$$\delta \mathbb L= \partial_b (2i\epsilon^{ab}X^\nu~\partial_a \zeta_{\nu}) \tag{7}$$ So, the variation of the Lagrangian density is a total derivative.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.