Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I would begin by apologizing for a soft question. Reading the FAQ, I have tried to formulate my question precisely in the last paragraph and you may skip the following paragraph where I make subjective observations, which I think may be relevant and any comments would be more than helpful. By formal education I mean registering in an academic department in a university as a grad/Phd Student.

Subjective belief: I feel I am personally not upto the mark of high-quality physics students. I need to learn a lot more, and do a lot more problems to be any good. I've noticed that Physics particularly is a very selective field dominated by hard-working and primarily young people who accomplish a lot at an early age (olympiads/contests, early phd's from very good places, etc). Even among this bunch a lot get filtered out and wouldn't get faculty positions. Theoretical Physicists tend to be outliers in a field almost entirely composed of outliers. And to learn from such a community, I feel an academic environment is essential, and not just reading books in isolation. So I beleive academia is the only legitimate environment that functions to produce sane physicists who know their field. However, if one has been set-back for some reason but carries the self-beleif that he can be smart enough to do it, would ageing be a parameter. I read a statement in Kleppner's undergrad mechancis book that "by finishing all this at the age of 26, Newton set the trend which follows today, that great advances are made by young physicists". I haven't found a counterexample so I would trust academic departments have the same criterion.

Q: Do people who missed out all the action in their 13-20 ages miss out on having a good career? What are the possible reasons to take a hiatus of "self-study" for a 22-year old so that he may be a good candiate for a respectable physics career (Phd/postdoc etc) later.

share|cite|improve this question

closed as primarily opinion-based by Brandon Enright, John Rennie, Qmechanic Aug 1 '14 at 12:40

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

I'll admit I'm not a fan of this question (well, not on this site), but since it seems like I might be the only one, and I can't cast a nonbinding close vote, I'll leave it alone - as long as it remains clear that we are talking about physics education specifically. – David Z Mar 21 '11 at 5:14
@David I went to Area51 to check wether Academia.SE has gone beta before I posted this. I sometimes get irritated sometimes myself when I am browsing and something irrelevant pops up. But this is the only place I know of which contains active physicists, and to me this is an important question. Also, in my question I specify that my intention is for a physics career, and not a general academic career. Biologists get into industries and they can still apply what they learned and enjoy it. – Approximist Mar 21 '11 at 5:35
just because there isn't another SE site for a given question, it doesn't mean it's appropriate here. Neither is a question necessarily appropriate just because physicists are the best ones to answer it. (Compare with the earlier days of Stack Overflow, when there were a lot of questions for programmers but not about programming; then programmers.SE got started to give them a home) As I said, I'm not going to close it if I'm the only one who thinks this way, but I would say might be a good place for this sort of question. – David Z Mar 21 '11 at 6:02
I should point out that this Stack question seems to have answers worth reviewing: – Roy Simpson Mar 21 '11 at 10:16

Remember the famous people are outliers. Superstars - just like in Hollywood - are not the norm.

A lot of science is done by very bright, hard working but ordinary people, the same very bright ordinary people that work in industry.

Yes there are fields, particulalrly maths, where there may be a biological reason that people do all their best work before their brains hit 25 - but it's not true in a lot of fields. It takes a lot of years to get the experience to know how to do things in many branches, especially experimental ones, and even more years to get up the tree to a position where you can get do to the experiment.

BUT taking 10years out because at 18 you don't think you know as much as everyone else is equally silly, most of your peers don't know as much as they pretend either!

share|cite|improve this answer

It depends on the country. In Greece there are so called "open university" academic programs, programs geared for older people wanting a higher education. Last week a 91 year old man was interviewed on TV because he is pursuing studies for a degree in "art appreciation".

I would agree with Martin Becket , that if one is serious enough in wanting to study physics one should not put it off for "not good enough in background" reasons. Yes, it is a competitive field, still, like any race, it is best to run it and see the results than not to and regret it.

share|cite|improve this answer

Taking a short hiatus should not prove fatal to your futur career, whatever that may be. I believe the theorist Dijkgraaff went to art school halfway through his studies! You're still very young, and the idea that all good work in physics and math is done before someone's 25th birthday seems farfetched; any major experiment takes years to set up, and good idea's in theory also take some time (the name of Mischa Gromov springs to mind). However, if you take a break, do it for the right reasons. It's not very likely that after one year, you'll return as the head of your class, full of wisdom about Chern classes and fermion doubling.

Finally, 'ageing' also differs per country. For example: in France, people tend to finish PhDs really early (around their 25th), but in Germany it's quite common to still be working on your Master's at that age.

share|cite|improve this answer
Also, Ed Witten didn't turn his attention to physics until after finishing his undergrad degree and working for a year in politics. – user1504 Mar 3 '14 at 0:06

I went to your profile and looked at some of your questions and answers. You should stick with it, I hope you are. You are bright and insightful. Don't get discouraged. You are smarter than you think. If you are suffering from chronic low self esteem, you might be suffering from depression. Consult a professional, and don't have too much pride to get help, even if it means drugs. A person as smart as you should not be halting an academic career out of self doubt regarding ability.

share|cite|improve this answer
While words of encouragement are nice, this isn't an answer. – Brandon Enright Aug 1 '14 at 4:35
You downvoted me because I gave heartfelt advice to someone who is clearly suffering unwarranted self-doubt. I guess the technical and unbendable rules of proper engagement here outweigh human compassion. – abalter Aug 1 '14 at 5:14
abalter's answer is an appropriate response to this question (even though the question doesn't really fit in at this site). – rob Aug 1 '14 at 14:09

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.