Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

On the Wikipedia I found that the Bohr radius is equal to:

\begin{align} \boxed{r_b=\dfrac{4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar^2}{m_e{e}^2}} \end{align}

but while we have been learning Bohr's model we derived the equation for a radius of the electron orbit like they do it on the hyperphysics:

\begin{split} &2\pi r = N \lambda_b\\ &\phantom{2\pi}r = \frac{N \lambda_b}{2\pi}\longleftarrow \lambda_b = \tfrac{h}{p}~,~p=mv\gamma(v)\\ &\phantom{2\pi}r = \frac{N h}{2\pi m_e v\, \gamma(v)}\\ &\phantom{2\pi}r = \frac{Nh \sqrt{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 r m_e}}{2 \pi m_e Ze_0\, \gamma(v)}\longleftarrow v = \sqrt{\tfrac{Z{e_0}^2}{4\pi \varepsilon_0rm_e}}\\ &\phantom{\,~\,}r^2 = \frac{N^2h^2 4 \pi \varepsilon_0 r m_e}{4 \pi^2 {m_e}^2 Z{e_0}^2 {\gamma(v)}^2}\\ &\phantom{2\pi}r = \frac{N^2h^2 \varepsilon_0}{\pi m_e Z{e_0}^2 {\gamma(v)}^2}\\ \\ &\substack{\text{We assume that $v \ll c$ and therefore $\gamma(v) = 1$}}\\ \\ &~\,~\boxed{r = \dfrac{N^2h^2 \varepsilon_0}{\pi m_e Z{e_0}^2}}~\boxed{r=\dfrac{N^2}{Z\vphantom{{e_0}^2}}r_b}\xrightarrow{\text{this means that Bohr radius is} } \boxed{r_b = \dfrac{h^2\varepsilon_0}{\pi m_e {e_0}^2}} \end{split}

Ok so I have two equations for Bohr's radius but I can't connect them, because if I insert $\hbar = h/(2\pi)$ into the one from Wikipedia I don't get the one from hyperphysics:

\begin{align} r_b=\dfrac{4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar^2}{m_e{e}^2} = \dfrac{4\pi\varepsilon_0h^2}{4^2\pi^2m_e{e}^2} = \!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\!\underbrace{\dfrac{h^2\varepsilon_0}{4\pi m_e{e}^2}}_{\substack{\text{This is not the same as the}\\\text{equation on the Hyperphysics...}}} \end{align}

Is Wikipedia wrong? Please someone fix it if it is...

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 2 down vote accepted

You made a mistake. On your last derivation, you have an extra 4 at the denominator:

\begin{align} r_b=\dfrac{4\pi\varepsilon_0\hbar^2}{m_e{e}^2} = \dfrac{4\pi\varepsilon_0h^2}{4\pi^2m_e{e}^2} = \frac{h^2\varepsilon_0}{\pi m_e{e}^2} \end{align}

Which is the formula you derived from hyperphysics.

share|cite|improve this answer
How can i be so sloppy $2^2 = 4!$ Sorry... – 71GA Jul 30 '13 at 10:20

So, essentially, Wikipedia has $$ a_0 = \frac{4 \pi \varepsilon_0 \hbar^2}{m_{\mathrm{e}} e^2} \, , $$ and hyperphysics has $$ r = \frac{n^2 h^2 \varepsilon_0}{Z \pi m_{\mathrm{e}} e^2} = \frac{n^2 a_0}{Z} \, . $$

From the hyperphysics formula $$ a_0 = \frac{h^2 \varepsilon_0}{\pi m_{\mathrm{e}} e^2} \, , $$ substituting $$ h = 2 \pi \hbar \, , $$ one will get exactly what is written in Wikipedia $$ a_0 = \frac{4 \pi^2 \hbar^2 \varepsilon_0}{\pi m_{\mathrm{e}} e^2} = \frac{4 \pi \hbar^2 \varepsilon_0}{m_{\mathrm{e}} e^2} \, . $$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.