Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am reading the original paper by Bondi, van der Berg and Metzner (link) regarding gravitational waves in asymptotically flat axisymmetric spacetimes. In the introduction, he makes the following comment -

The conservation of mass effectively prohibits purely spherically symmetric waves and similarly, conservation of momentum prohibits waves of dipole symmetry.

I know that Birkhoff's theorem tells us that spherically symmetric asymptotically flat solution to GR is necessarily static, and therefore contains a timelike Killing vector, which implies conservation of mass (energy). Bondi et. al. seem to be stating the converse of this theorem, whose validity I do not immediately see. How do we show this?

Also, what is the corresponding proof of the second statement made above?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 1 down vote accepted

All you need to do is set up a multipole expansion of the gravitational waveform. You'll find that the monopole moment is proportional to the time derivative of the mass of the stress-energy tensor, and the dipole moment is proportional to the second time derivative of the momentum from the stress-energy tensor, both of which are conserved. Thus, the first nonzero moment comes from the quadrupole moment. This is worked out in great detail in MTW.

share|cite|improve this answer
I see! I'll work it out. Thanks a lot! – Prahar Jul 23 '13 at 13:53

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.