Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What is the Schmidt decomposition of the tripartite states$|GHZ\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt 2}[|000\rangle+|111\rangle]$ or $|W\rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt 3}[|001\rangle+|010\rangle+|100\rangle]$? Are these same as that of their canonical forms?

share|cite|improve this question
Schmidt decomposition doesn't have a three particle equivalent. I mean you may not always write a 3 particle state $|\psi \rangle $ as $\sum{\alpha_i |\phi_i\rangle \otimes |\chi_i \rangle \otimes |\xi_i \rangle}$ – Ali Jul 18 '13 at 10:04
@Ali I'm not talking about any generalized tri-qubit state but only about GHZ and W state. – Prabir Das Jul 18 '13 at 12:46

In this reference , it is stated that the sufficient as well as necessary condition for the existence of Schmidt decomposition for a tripartite system is that the partial inner product of a basis of any one of the subsystems (belonging to a Hilbert space of smaller dimension) with the state of the composite system gives a disentangled basis.

[EDIT] (Following Peter Shor commentary, the criteria was not correctly applied)

The GHZ state is already obviously Schmidt-decomposed. If we choose one of the basis $|0_1\rangle |1_1\rangle$, or $|0_2\rangle |1_2\rangle$, or $|0_3\rangle, |1_3\rangle$ and take the inner product, we find a separable state : For instance, the inner product with $|0_1\rangle$ gives $\sim$ $|0_20_3\rangle$ which is a separable basis).

The W state cannot be Schmidt-decomposed :

First, remember that a state $a|00\rangle + b|01\rangle + c|10\rangle + d|11\rangle$ is separable if and only if the discriminant $ \Delta = ad -bc=0$.

Now, we take a general basis for the first subsystem $\alpha |0_1\rangle + \beta |1_1\rangle$, $\beta |0_1\rangle - \alpha |1_1\rangle$ with $\alpha^2 + \beta^2 =1$, and take the inner product with the W-state. So, we get, for the inner products :

$\alpha (|0_21_3\rangle + |1_20_3\rangle) + \beta |0_20_3\rangle$ and $\beta (|0_21_3\rangle + |1_20_3\rangle) - \alpha |0_20_3\rangle$

The two discriminants are $ - \alpha^2$ and $ - \beta^2$.

So, the inner-product resulting states are separable only if $\alpha =0$ and $\beta =0$ , which is impossible.

Because of the symmetry of the W state, the demonstration is the same for a general basis of the $2nd$ and $3rd$ sub-system.

So, applying the criteria, the $W$ state is not Schmidt-decomposable

share|cite|improve this answer
You are using the criterion incorrectly. You have to show that there is no basis which satisfies the criterion in the W system. For example, if we take the inner product of $\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\left(|0_1 \rangle + |1_1\rangle\right)$ with the GHZ state, you get $\frac{1}{2}\left(|0_2 0_3\rangle+ |1_2 1_3\rangle\right)$, which is entangled. So to show a state is not Schmidt-decomposable, it's not enough to just choose one state, take the inner product, and find it's entangled. This is what you've done in your answer. – Peter Shor Jul 19 '13 at 11:38
@PeterShor : Thanks. I have made an edit to the answer. Hope it is correct. – Trimok Jul 19 '13 at 18:54
+1: It's correct now. – Peter Shor Jul 19 '13 at 19:40

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.