Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

So I am thinking of making a machine that turns electrons into positrons. So you put as many electrons as you want in one side and positrons come out the other side. This will solve all out energy problems! But before I start my project I need to know what determines the change of an electron. Right now, the only way to make antimatter is particle accelerators but these are super uneconomical and inefficient so I want to make a machine that is economical and efficient but I don't know how... if my machine is physically impossible to make, theoretically, what machine will allow me to do this? Will it ever be invented or is it just too impossible to make?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as off-topic by John Rennie, Dilaton, Chris White, Qmechanic Jul 18 '13 at 15:42

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "We deal with mainstream physics here. Questions about the general correctness of unpublished personal theories are off topic, although specific questions evaluating new theories in the context of established science are usually allowed. For more information, see Is non mainstream physics appropriate for this site?." – John Rennie, Chris White, Qmechanic
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

There are conserved quantities(preserved charge numbers) preventing you from doing this(at least due to the current physical knowledge). e.g. one of these quantities is the well known electric charge! which is conserved. – Ali Jul 18 '13 at 7:22
It took centuries, maybe millenia, to learn how to turn lead into gold. It was even thought impossible. Now we may barely know how to do it at great expense. So do not despair, keep working, and be patient. One point though: the people who succeeded were looking for something else. – babou Jul 18 '13 at 12:38

The charge of an electron is part of the definition of an electron. If you have a particle with a different charge than $-e$ then it is not an electron by definition. There is currently no deeper theory of why there should exist particles with the basic defining properties of an electron (charge $-e$, mass ~511 keV, spin 1/2, ...). These properties just go into the theory as a basic ingredient.

If you ask the question "is there any process which changes the net charge" then the answer is no. There are very strong theoretical reasons for believing that charge is exactly conserved in all reactions in nature. As far as direct experimental evidence goes, the Particle Data Group lists the limit on the rate of charge changing interactions as less than once per $6.4\times10^{24}\ \mathrm{yr}$ (possibly not available on the pdg website, but available here - thanks Ali. It is also available in the print version of the review.).

Particle accelerators do not produce antimatter by converting charged particles into their antiparticles like $e^- \to e^+$, rather they work by pair production processes where the net charge is conserved, for example $e^- \to e^- + e^- + e^+$.

share|cite|improve this answer
@Ali Thanks. Those are the same figures from the PDG. – Michael Brown Jul 18 '13 at 7:27
+1 But if you were really patient, couldn't you wait for one of those false vacuum domain wall thingies to come along, and mess with the physical constants, including the electron charge? (lol!) – twistor59 Jul 18 '13 at 7:34
@twistor59 Sure, why not? Does the domain wall come with cake? Even if I only get to enjoy the cake as a Boltzmann brain... – Michael Brown Jul 18 '13 at 7:39
You're welcome. @twistor59 Who knows, those domain walls can arrive in just a second! – Ali Jul 18 '13 at 7:54

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.