Sign up ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

I am looking at this paper (Multicoated gratings, J. Opt. Soc. Am., 1981) and I am getting confused around equation 22. I do not completely understand where he comes up with the equation

$$\xi^j_q=b_q^j(R^{-1}V_q^j)\qquad \text{(22)}$$

And then what is the meaning of the $b^{j+1}$. I initially thought they were the eigenvalues of the T matrix he defines, but all he says is that it is a vector of components $b^q_j$.

This includes the $\bf b^0$ and $\bf b^{Q+1}$ which I do not see how they are vectors?

share|cite|improve this question
It is said (just before $(22)$) that the $\xi^j_q$ are proportional to the eigenvectors $R^{-1}V_q^j$ So $b_q^j$ is just the ratio (which is different for each $j$ and $q$), between the two terms ,that is : $$\xi^j_q=b_q^j(R^{-1}V_q^j)$$ $\bf b^j$ is the vector with coordinates $b_q^j$, $q = 1,2,....+\infty$ (see just after $(23)$ – Trimok Jul 17 '13 at 17:45

1 Answer 1

The formal structure shows, that the matrix in brackets is of same dimension as the matrix $\xi^j_q$. Therefore $b_q^j$ is just a proportionality constant. The coatings/media of the optical structure are labeled by index $j$. $$\xi^j_q=b_q^j(R^{-1}V_q^j)\qquad \text{(22)}$$

And then what is the meaning of the $\bf b^{j+1}$?

The set of equations (22) is expressed in equation (23). By by introducing a new vector $$\bf{b^j}= \begin{pmatrix} b^j_1\\ b^j_2\\ \dots\\ b^j_\infty \end{pmatrix} $$ you get rid of index q. Where the index $j$ labels the medium of the coating. So you got some vector description of each coating layer $j$. Citing the paper

The problem reduces now to the search for vectors $\bf b^j$ in each medium.

share|cite|improve this answer
Any idea on how to solve for the $\mathbf b^j$ – yankeefan11 Jul 18 '13 at 17:41
Linear algebra, since equation (23) is of form $$\bf{\xi}=M\quad\bf{b^j}$$Take inverse $M^{-1}$ – Stefan Bischof Jul 18 '13 at 17:48
Equation 24, has $b^j$ in both sides of the equation. Do I want equation 23 and actually solve for the $\xi$ – yankeefan11 Jul 18 '13 at 17:49
You are correct. I had to write (23). This was my first thought. – Stefan Bischof Jul 18 '13 at 17:51
Not a problem. Any chance you understand what the author says in 4A about the matrix sizes that reduces equation 28 to 4N+2 equations with that many unknowns? – yankeefan11 Jul 18 '13 at 17:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.