Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Checked around a buch and could not find any help. But I needed help with:

Understanding that if I get the Inverse FT of K-space data, what is the scaling on the X-space (object space) resultant image/data i.e. for every tick on the axis, how do I know the spatial length?

More detailed explanation in the below image.

enter image description here

share|cite|improve this question
Is this a homework problem? – tpg2114 Jul 9 '13 at 1:34
No, not at all. I am geniunely trying to understand this for a week now but cannot. I made the image in powerpoint because, at this point, I am desperate for help. – user1886681 Jul 9 '13 at 1:39
Did you read the link there to see how we define homework? It's not "assigned in a class" type of question per se. – tpg2114 Jul 9 '13 at 1:41
This is not for a class. Its for my overall understanding, but I guess I could tag as such. I'm not necessarily looking for some one to solve it, I dont think they can with the info I gave them...I just need to understand the scales. – user1886681 Jul 9 '13 at 1:45
Even without that ambiguity, "K-space" is not a universally understood physics term. Or rather it is universal - it always means the Fourier transform of something "real." What that real thing is depends on context. What exactly is going on here? Is this a CCD on a camera? Are there optics involved? Is this an X-ray diffraction question? Without context this is unanswerable. – Chris White Jul 10 '13 at 0:52

The units of your X-space are the inverse of the units of your K-space. So if your K-space is in $\mathrm{m}^{-1}$, then your X-space will be in $\mathrm{m}$.

To make the full circuit $f(x) \rightarrow F(k) \rightarrow f(x)$ requires an overall normalization factor of $1/2\pi$ to ensure that you get the function you started with. As Chris White points out in his comment, there are a few different conventions on where exactly to put this normalization factor. Some put it entirely on one of the transformations. Some conventions split it between the two transforms, and put $1/\sqrt{2\pi}$ on each integral; this has the advantage of making the Fourier transform and the inverse Fourier transform perfectly symmetrical with respect to $x$ and $k$.

In addition, some conventions for wavenumber define it as cycles per unit distance (so that $xk = 1$), while some define wavenumber as radians per unit distance (so that $xk = 2\pi$).

Ultimately, you might need to multiply the axes in your X space by $1, \sqrt{2\pi},$ or $2\pi$, depending on the set of conventions your software is using, and the convention you have used to express your $k$ values. You should already know the latter. For the former, you will have to check the documentation for the Fourier transform in your software.

share|cite|improve this answer

Ok, so firstly thanks so much for all of your help...

Secondly I have wrote down the solution (ATTACHED PDF) that one of the guys in my group gave me. But to be honest I don't understand the very first relation (in step one).

I specifically don't understand how the width of the peak in pixels fits in? Any guidance?

enter image description here

enter image description here

share|cite|improve this answer
what software are you using for the plots and presentations? – WetSavannaAnimal aka Rod Vance Oct 10 '13 at 23:53

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.