Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Is the result of applying the D'Alembert operator on a wave function always zero? Or are there exceptions?

share|improve this question
5  
First of all, zero would also be a result. Second of all, the function entering the massless Klein-Gordon equation (given by the D'Alembert operator) isn't a wave function but a field - classical or quantum field. If it were a wave function, the energy wouldn't be positively definite because there would be both solutions with $\exp(i\omega t)$ and $\exp(-i\omega t)$, positive and negative-frequency solutions, and energy would be unbounded from below. That's why "second quantization" is a must in relativistic theories and the function can't be an ordinary wave function. –  Luboš Motl Jul 7 '13 at 5:15

1 Answer 1

The Klein-Gordon equation for a free particle is as follows:

$$\left(\hat\Box+\mu^2\right)\Psi=0$$

Where $\mu=\pm \frac{mc_0}{\hbar}$ is the so-called scaled mass and $\hat\Box$ is the D' Alembert's operator in question. Solving for $\hat\Box\Psi$,

$$\hat\Box\Psi=-\mu^2\Psi=\left(i\mu\right)^2\Psi$$

So, yes, there are results. If the mass $m=0$, however, then $\mu=0$, and thus $i\mu=0$, and thus $\left(i\mu\right)^2=0$. And thus

$$\hat\Box\Psi=0$$

Conclusion: D'Alembert's operator kills the wavefunction (or more accurately, field) only for massless particles, i.e. it operates on the wavefunction (field) to yield $0$ iff the particle is massless. For non-zero masses, this will not be the case.

share|improve this answer
4  
Why the downvote? Speaking as a non-expert, dimension10's answer seems clear. If there is a problem with it that caused you to downvote I would be interested to know what the problem is. –  John Rennie Jul 7 '13 at 8:08
    
It's true what you say, but it is too formal--- you can just say it without the trivial manipulations, let the reader figure it out. –  Ron Maimon Aug 22 '13 at 22:06
    
@RonMaimon: I know, but I was pretty sure that would get the answer in the low quality queue which I'd not want it to go to. –  Dimensio1n0 Aug 23 '13 at 1:58

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.