Sign up ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

The current model for the elementary particles is the standard model. I understand its basics It is for me however, difficult to wrap my mind around it without having some kind of knowledge of the predecessors of this model. Just like first KLMN shells are taught first instead of SPDL, I feel the need of following this model from the beginning. I found the Gell-Mann's much simpler to understand, no matter how incomplete it was as compared to today's model.

So, could you please list a list of models of elementary particles right from the beginning? To study them that way would be much easier.


share|cite|improve this question

closed as too broad by Kyle Kanos, ACuriousMind, John Rennie, Danu, Pranav Hosangadi Feb 2 at 7:38

There are either too many possible answers, or good answers would be too long for this format. Please add details to narrow the answer set or to isolate an issue that can be answered in a few paragraphs.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Well, first there were four elements: fire, water, air and earth... The problem with this approach is that history is full of blind alleys. Do you really want to study a list of things like caloric, luminiferous ether, and phlogiston? Do you really think that will contribute to your understanding? You might be better limiting this to a fairly recent time or to particles that are still in the list. – dmckee Jul 6 '13 at 20:53
@dmckee actually it really helps to understand other's mistakes and why those theories abounded, anyway maybe the time of your entire life will be not enough to grasp all those variations, so maybe any simple historical book on QFT development will give you the big picture. – TMS Jul 7 '13 at 6:29
@TMS Yes, looking at the blind alleys can be instructive, but as asked the question calls for book length answers. – dmckee Jul 7 '13 at 18:57