Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Is it possible to have particles obeying anyonic statistics but not having fractional spin?

I am wondering, because while spin in quantum physics arises from the geometry/topology of spacetime, statistics is connected to the geometry/topology of configuration space.

What would particles like this be called?

share|cite|improve this question
Bosons and fermions are special case of anyons. Bosons and fermions are representation of the symmetric group $S_n$. Anyons are representation of the Braid group $B_n$. And you have a surjective homomorphism from $B_n$ to $S_n$. So $B_n$ is a much richer group than $S_n$. See an Anyon primer for more information. – Trimok Jul 3 '13 at 10:03
Thank you @Trimok. I know the braid group well and how it arises in the topological analysis of the configuration space of $n$ indistinguishable particles. In $2d$ spin is fractional. But my question would be, are there structures, i.e. particle-like objects, obeying anyonic statistics but do not have fractional spin (maybe none). Are there physical systems like this and how are these objects called? – Hamurabi Jul 3 '13 at 22:52
It depends by what you mean by "anyonic statistics". For me, "anyonic statistics" means a representation of $B_n$. So I just wanted to point, that $S_n$ is a subgroup of $B_n$. Or, said differently, bosons, which have integer spin, for instance, are only a very special case of anyonic statistics. Now, if we exclude bosons, I think there is no integer spin particle obeying anyonic statistics. If we exchange 2 anyons, this corresponds to a phase change $e^{2i\pi s}$, where $s$ is the spin. $s$ integer means bosons, and $s$ semi-integer means fermions. Other particles have not a integer spin. – Trimok Jul 4 '13 at 2:32
What if we do not have a spin structure attached to the fields leading to an $n$-particle config. space? – Hamurabi Jul 4 '13 at 13:46
The phase change is related to the spin (even non integer and non semi-integer). – Trimok Jul 4 '13 at 14:38
up vote 2 down vote accepted

Due to spin-statistics theorem, anyons always have fractional spin.

share|cite|improve this answer
Ok. But when one evaluates the Hilbert space dimension of anyons dwelling on a surface using the Verlinde formula and the fusion multiplicities $N_{ij}^k$, one sums over the labels. Are these labels spins? – Hamurabi Jul 30 '13 at 10:17
No. these labels are not spins. – Xiao-Gang Wen Jul 30 '13 at 10:35
So what are they? Don't they come from the liealgebra-valued connection one-forms $A$, the colouring of the punctures/anyons/particles? – Hamurabi Jul 30 '13 at 12:11
The labels, ie the indices of $N^k_{ij}$, label the topological type of quasiparticles. Each topological type of quasiparticle has a fractional spin (ie a fractional angular momentum). – Xiao-Gang Wen Oct 5 '13 at 11:18
thank you. maybe then it is better to ask for the physical motivation of the connection field $A$ and what physically its colouring by $su(2)$ means? – Hamurabi Oct 8 '13 at 16:51

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.