# Would a pendulum swing indefinitely in a frictionless vacuum?

I am attempting to settle a friendly bet. Would a pendulum swing indefinitely in a hypothetical vacuum (i.e. no air resistance) having a hypothetical frictionless bearing (i.e. no energy lost due to friction) assuming the following

1. The frictionless vacuum is on Earth (9.8 m/s^2).

2. The pendulum is already in motion and no other external forces other than gravity act on the pendulum.

-

## migrated from math.stackexchange.comJun 24 '13 at 9:16

This question came from our site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields.

–  Emilio Pisanty Nov 18 '13 at 13:59

Yes. this is a perfect case of a so called perpetuum mobile (see here).

It would respresent a perfect (ideal) non-dissipative system where entropy production $d_iS/dt=0$, in accordance with the 2nd law of thermodynamics. Indeed the first law of thermodynamics (energy conservation) does not say much about this, except that no term for energy loss included.

However, the system must be really non-dissipative, that means no type of friction or dissipative loss of energy in any way, such as friction in the elements of the pendulum etc.

-

The real world is full of small effects that only matter when you've eliminated everything else. For example, if the pendulum has a non-zero conductivity its motion through the Earth's magnetic field would cause eddy currents and dissipate energy. This would be a tiny effect, but it would mean the pendulum wouldn't oscillate for ever. I imagine the more creative minds hereabouts could come up with a number of vanishingly small effects that would eventually damp the pendulum.

If you manage to eliminate all these effects then yes, the pendulum will oscillate forever. However you're just asking whether if all sources of energy dissipation are removed will any energy be dissipated, and the answer is obviously no.

-
Gravitational wave emission cannot be removed. –  Michael Brown Jun 24 '13 at 9:32
Gravitational wave emission can be removed if the pendulum motion has no quadrupole or higher moments. –  John Rennie Jun 24 '13 at 11:09
True, but I must confess I can't visualise what kind of "pendulum" that would be. (Not that I'm particularly good at visualising quadrupole moments.) –  Michael Brown Jun 24 '13 at 11:13
@JohnRennie: it would have to be a perfect monopole or a dipole. a perfect monopole would be a sphere, so that's out as a pendulum. I have to admit that picturing what a perfect dipole is without a negative charge, but I don't see an easy way to make $\int\rho x^{i}x^{j}x^{k}$ equal zero, but $\int \rho x^{i}$ nonzero. –  Jerry Schirmer Aug 22 '13 at 1:10
Actually, I'm asking this as a question: Does a pendulum emit gravitational waves? –  Emilio Pisanty Nov 18 '13 at 14:39

It would because the pendulum wouldnt be losing its kinetic energy due to air friction. In a normal scenario the pendulum faces friction from the air around it and continously loses energy to this. In a frictionless envioronment there is no resistive friction hence it goes on
.This motion is referred to as "Simple Harmonic Motion".

-

## protected by Qmechanic♦Nov 18 '13 at 16:23

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality answers, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site.