Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In a interaction-round-a-face model of $n^2$ particles in a lattice, a weight $W(a,b,c,d)$ is assigned to each face in the lattice based on the spins $a,b,c,d$ (listed say from the bottom-left corner in counter-clockwise fashion) of the particles at the corners of the face. Based on this, a partition function is formed $Z=\sum\prod W(a,b,c,d)$, where the the sum is over all possible spins of all particles and the product is over all the faces in the lattice. The well-known text Exactly Solved Models in Statistical Mechanics by Baxter shows how to obtain exact solutions for $Z$ in a couple cases, like the six-vertex model and the eight-vertex model, using "commuting transfer matrices." In reading Baxter's book, I am uncertain of the applicability of this method. For instance, I am working on a particular application where particles in a square lattice can have either up spin (+1) or down spin (-1) and the weight of any face $W(a,b,c,d)=1$ unless all four spins around the face alternate, in which case $W(1,-1,1,-1)=W(-1,1,-1,1)=4$. (The boundary condition here is that the all the spins on the boundary must be up.)

Does anyone know if the commuting-transfer-matrix method (or any other method) should yield an exact solution for this particular weighting of the spins? More generally, should the commuting-transfer-matrix method yield exact solutions for any weighting of the spins (even in the two-spin case)?

share|improve this question
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.