Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is a question about deriving effective mass theory for graphene. For the two sub-lattice atoms, the wave equation can be written as the massless Dirac equation:

$ \displaystyle -i\hbar v_F \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \partial_x -i\partial_y \\\partial_x +i\partial_y & 0 \end{pmatrix} \left(\begin{array}{c} \Psi_A \\ \Psi_B \end{array}\right)=E \left(\begin{array}{c} \Psi_A \\ \Psi_B \end{array}\right) \ \ \ \ \ (1)$ where ${A,B}$ are two subatoms.

The derivation of the equation went back to 1984, which is the paper I am trying to understand. In the article, they argued that at first order of ${\vec{\kappa}\cdot \vec{p}}$ expansion, the momentum matrix can be written in the form, under group-theoretic arguments (equation (3) in the paper):

$ \displaystyle \bar{p}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & \hat{x} -i\hat{y} \\ \hat{x} +i\hat{y} & 0 \end{pmatrix} . \ \ \ \ \ (2)$

What is the argument behind it? Is there anyone read the paper or know the answer?

share|cite|improve this question
If you just want to derive the massless Dirac equation, you can do it in a much more elementary way. Model graphene with a (nearest-neighbor) tight-binding model on the honeycomb lattice. Fourier-transform and expand to linear order in momentum (around the Dirac points), then you should find the Dirac Hamiltonian. – Heidar Mar 14 '11 at 22:57
as for instance is done in this very nice paper The Electronic Spectrum of Fullerenes from the Dirac Equation. – user346 Mar 14 '11 at 23:32

Take a look at this paper .

share|cite|improve this answer
In the future please include arXiv abstract page if possible, e.g., – Qmechanic Feb 19 '12 at 14:16

In the paper of J.M. McCLURE(1956), he showed how to directly calculate the momentum matrix. (eq.2.5,2.6)

Diamagnetism of Graphite,Phys. Rev. 104, 666–671 (1956)

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.