Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I read that the F-1 engine from the 1st stage of the Saturn V rocket is the most powerful engine ever created by mankind, delivering ~200 gigawatts of power.

Thus, I have got two questions:

  • Will future rockets propelled by nuclear energy be able to surpass this limit, reaching magnitudes of terawatt power or beyond?

  • What is the theoretical limit to a rocket/spaceship engine power, if any?

share|cite|improve this question
As an appetizer: – Deer Hunter Jun 22 '13 at 6:53
As a comment: F-1 was the most powerful liquid-fuel engine. Each one of two Shuttle's SRBs (solid rocket boosters) provided 80% more thrust than F-1. – Deer Hunter Jun 22 '13 at 7:03
A good answer must touch upon: scaling laws, thermal constraints at the nozzle, non-traditional (magnetic) nozzle designs, tradeoff between launching from the Earth/assembling in orbit, reliability tradeoffs (one engine out contingencies). – Deer Hunter Jun 22 '13 at 7:11
Why don't you use wikipedia for links? Here is article about F-1 and it is not the most powerful liquid-fuel engine, Soviet RD-170 is. – Sigrlami Jun 22 '13 at 8:09
@DeerHunter You made emphasis on single-chamber parameter. I will disagree with you, it's a constructional parameter, not physical. Since we are on Physics.SE we have initial conditions: liquid-propellant rocket and highest thrust. I don't see how OP specified constructional conditions, so statement "... is the most powerful engine ever created by mankind" is wrong. – Sigrlami Jun 22 '13 at 9:39

Usually nuclear rockets have lower thrust than chemical rockets, in a nuclear rocket you are trying to get the heat from the reactor into the propellant, which means a lower temperature. In a chemical rocket you have all the heat in the propellant, and try to avoid getting it anywhere else. Nuclear rockets make up for this deficiency by using a very light propellant (H2) to increase the exhaust velocity in order to make them very efficient. However, this lowers the thrust.

share|cite|improve this answer

Oh yes, particularly if we ever resurrect Project Orion, which works by tossing nukes out the back of the spacecraft and setting them off. It does, of course, take a pretty good buffer plate to absorb the momentum impulse.

Using Tsar Bomba as an upper limit to what might be employed, suggests something on the order of 34 yottawatts as a peak power.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.