Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In string theory the D-branes give those directions that the strings are allowed to move along. The string excitations give the fields that we detect. Is it correct to think of a particle propagating in 4d spacetime as a string propagating in the same 4d spacetime (in other words if we could zoom in sufficiently far a photon for example would reveal itself to be a string). If so, this implies that a realistic model should always have D-branes that extend in these 4 spacetime directions. Otherwise how would the strings, and their associated excitations, propagate in the 'normal' spacetime we see at low energies?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 4 down vote accepted

Yes, there must be branes filling the ordinary large spacetime dimensions in order for gauge fields to propagate there. Even the Type I string theory containing gauge fields (open strings) in 10 dimensions can be understood as having space-filling D9 branes on which the gauge fields live (as well as an orientifold O9 plane).

The exception is heterotic string theory, which has gauge fields that don't have an obvious natural interpretation in terms of branes. (Via dualities, you can always find some kind of brane interpretation, although the end-of-the-world branes in heterotic M-theory are different from ordinary D-branes.)

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you, I found this helpful. – Siraj R Khan Jun 19 '13 at 14:48

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.