Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Whenever I see the total non-relativistic molecular Hamiltonian,

$\hat{H}_{molecular} = \hat{T}_{e} + \hat{T}_{n} + \hat{V}_{ee} + \hat{V}_{nn} + \hat{V}_{en}$

I always notice that the sums describing the electron-electron and the nucleus-nucleus interactions respectively are corrected for overcounting (i.e. the second index is greater than the first),

$\hat{V}_{ee} = \sum_{i}\sum_{j>i}\frac{1}{|\mathbf{r_{i} - r_{j}}|}$

$\hat{V}_{nn} = \sum_{I}\sum_{J>I}\frac{Z_{I}Z_{J}}{|\mathbf{R_{I} - R_{J}}|}$

whereas the sum describing electron-nucleus interactions is not corrected for overcounting:

$\hat{V}_{en} = \sum_{I}\sum_{j}\frac{Z_{I}}{\mathbf{|R_{I} - r_{j}}|}$

Could anyone possibly tell me why this is?

Thank-you!

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Let's call the two types or particle $n$ and $e$.

When summing over the interactions between particles of type $n$, say, you have a sum like this

$\sum_i\sum_{j>i} H_{ij}$

where $i$ and $j$ are both sums over the $n$s. You need the $j>i$ because without it the pair $i=2, j=3$ (say) means the second particle of type $n$ and the third particle of type $n$. But this very same pair also reoccurs when $j=3, i=2$. You don't want to count both.

But when summing over pairs of different types of particles then in the sum

$\sum_i\sum_j H_{ij}$

the $i$ is over particles of type $n$ and the $j$ is over type $e$ (say). You can't possibly be double counting because no particle of type $n$ is a particle of type $e$. So the pair given by $i=2, j=3$, say, isn't ever the same as the pair given by $j=2, i=3$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.