Sign up ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

It would be nice to have a cute method that uses Lorentz transformations of basis vectors by exponential transformation using gamma matrices. To avoid confusion, let's assume -+++ signature. Given $\gamma_\mu$ as gamma matrices that satisfy ${\rm tr}(\gamma_\mu\gamma_\nu) = 4\eta_{\mu\nu}$, then we have ${\rm tr}(\gamma'_\mu\gamma'_\nu) = 4\eta_{\mu\nu}$ if we put:
$\gamma'_\mu = \exp(-A)\gamma_\mu\exp(+A)$
where $A$ is any matrix.

Boosts and rotations use $A$ as a bivector. For example, with $\alpha$ a real number, $A=\alpha\gamma_0\gamma_3$ boosts in the z direction while $A=\alpha\gamma_1\gamma_2$ gives a rotation around the z axis.

Solving for the value of $\alpha$ that gives a boost with velocity $\beta = v/c$ appears to be straightforward. But how to do the rotations?

And by the way, what happens when you generalize $A$ to be something other than bivectors?

share|cite|improve this question
I am tempted to write something up on Geometric Algebra for this. – Roy Simpson Mar 13 '11 at 13:02
I suppose you realize that bivectors actually form a representation of the Lorentz Lie algebra in the Clifford algebra and that's why these matrices (and none others) are important for transformation of gamma vectors (which in turn form a representation of the Lorentz group). – Marek Mar 13 '11 at 13:05
Poincare Group, you are interested in the lie algebra of this group, which can be found in most standard references. See for example, QFT by Ryder. – Matt Calhoun Mar 13 '11 at 16:05

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The most general Lorentz transformation that is connected to the identity is given by the conjugation by $\exp(-A)$ where $$ A = \frac 12 \omega_{\mu\nu} \gamma^\mu \gamma^\nu $$ and $\omega_{\mu\nu}$ is an antisymmetric tensor containing $D(D-1)/2$ parameters. The group of all such transformations is isomorphic to $Spin(D-1,1)$. If $\omega$ only contains one component $0\mu$, then it is a boost, and the nonzero numerical value of $\omega$ is the rapidity - the "hyperbolic angle" $\eta$ such that $v/c=\tanh\eta$.

If only one doubly spatial component of $\omega$ is nonzero, then this component $\omega_{\mu\nu} = -\omega_{\nu\mu}$ is obviously the angle itself. Note that the spatial-spatial terms in $A$ are anti-Hermitean, producing unitary transformations; the mixed temporal-spatial terms in $A$ are Hermitean and they don't product unitary transformations on the 4-component space of spinors (but they become unitary if they're promoted to transformations of the full Hilbert space of quantum field theory).

In 4 dimensions, a general antisymmetric matrix $4\times 4$ contains 6 independent parameters and has eigenvalues $\pm i a, \pm i b$, so in 3+1 dimensions, one can always represent a general Lorentz transformation as a rotation around an axis in the 4-dimensional space followed by a boost in the complementary transverse 2-plane. This is the counterpart of the statement that any $SU(2)$ rotations in 3 dimensions is a rotation around a particular axis by an angle.

If you allowed $A$ to contain something else than $\gamma^{\mu\nu}$ matrices which generate the Lorentz group, you could get other groups. Only for a properly chosen subset of allowed values of $\omega$, you would get a closed group from the resulting exponentials (under multiplication). In particular, if you allowed $A$ to be an arbitrary complex combination of any products of gamma matrices, well, then you would allow $A$ to be any complex $4\times 4$ matrix, and its exponentials would produce the full group $GL(4,C)$ - surprising, Carl? ;-) It's not a terribly useful groups in physics because actions are usually not invariant under this "full group", are they?

Also, there are not too many groups in between $Spin(3,1)$ and $GL(4,C)$ - I guess that there's no proper group of $GL(4,C)$ that has a proper $Spin(3,1)$ subgroup. Obviously, there are many subgroups of $Spin(3,1)$ - such as $Spin(3)$, $Spin(1,1)\times Spin(2)$, and others.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.