Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The first Navier-Stokes equation (conservation of mass) says: $\vec \nabla \cdot \vec v=0$

For a stationary flow, the l.h.s of the second equation is (conservation of momentum): $\rho \frac{D\vec v}{Dt}=\rho (\underbrace{\frac{\partial \vec v}{\partial t}}_{=0} + (\vec v\cdot \vec \nabla) \vec v)=\rho ( \underbrace{(\vec \nabla \cdot \vec v)}_{=0??} \vec v)\stackrel{??}{=}0$

I find that the l.h.s of the conservation of momentum equation is always equal to zero for a stationary field. I know this isn't true but where am I wrong in this reasoning ?

share|cite|improve this question
Note that $\vec\nabla\cdot\vec v=0$ only for incompressible flow. The real first Navier-Stokes equation is the conservation of mass, $$\partial_t\rho + \vec\nabla(\rho\vec v)=0.$$ And what the stationary momentum equation gives you (since $\rho\neq0$) is $$\underbrace{(\vec v\cdot\vec\nabla)}_{=\frac\partial{\partial\vec v}}\vec v=0,$$ i.e. $\vec v$ is constant along its own direction – Tobias Kienzler Jun 11 '13 at 13:08
up vote 1 down vote accepted

Your mistake here is to assume that the multiplication $\vec v\cdot \vec \nabla$ is commutative. It is not; the dot product here is just a convenient mathematical notation. This part of the Wikipedia article on Navier-Stokes equations explains how to interpret this term.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.