Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Follow by the Michelson–Morley experiment, What happen if we use something that has a speed lower than light instead of light in Michelson–Morley experiment? How about the result?

share|improve this question
It's not about the speed as such. It is about the relationship between the observed speed of the wave and speed of the observer relative the medium of propagation (if any). The expectation for (say) sound in air is exactly what MM calculated as the assumed result of their experiment before they started. Only you don't need an interferometer to observe this effect in air, you can do it with a car horn because you can travel at multiple percent of the speed of sound very easily. –  dmckee Jun 11 '13 at 3:42

1 Answer 1

The aim of the Michelson–Morley experiment was to measure how fast the aether is moving relative to Earth, and to do this you need some phenomenon that propagates as a disturbance in the aether. Light was the only phenomenon believed (incorrectly of course :-) to propagate as a disturbance in the aether. That's why light was used.

As dmckee says in his comment, if you use something like sound you aren't measuring the speed of the aether because sound propagates as disturbances in air not in the aether. Using sound would measure how fast the air is moving relative to your equipment. This would work fine, though there are easier ways to measure wind speed.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.