Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I figure that the resistance of multiple wires would work just like adding in parallel, a bunch of wires that is. But couldn't any wire just be viewed as a bunch of wires, albeit small ones? I know that it isn't added like that, the area is put in the denominator, but why can't a single wire be viewed as a lot of small wires side by side?

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

Yes, that's exactly how it works. As you know, the resistances for multiple resistors (such as wires) in parallel are "added" up as

$$\frac{1}{R} = \frac{1}{R_1} + \frac{1}{R_2} + \cdots$$

And the formula for resistance of a thin wire of uniform cross section and composition is $R = \frac{\rho L}{A}$. So if you have a bunch of wires with areas $A_1$, $A_2$, etc., and you combine their resistances, you get

$$\begin{align} \frac{1}{R} &= \frac{A_1}{\rho L} + \frac{A_2}{\rho L} + \cdots \\ &= \frac{A_1 + A_2 + \cdots}{\rho L} \\ &= \frac{A_\text{total}}{\rho L} \end{align}$$

which matches the resistance of one wire of area $A_\text{total}$.

share|improve this answer

This is a good, insightful question.

If you're only considering a constant current (DC), where resistance is effectively the only consideration, then your intuition is correct.

However, for alternating currents (AC), a single wire is not necessarily equivalent to a "bunch of wires" due to, for example, the skin effect.

Consider Litz wire as a counter example.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.