Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I am trying to figure out the amount of work done when I walk X miles or for X minutes. So I got Work=Force x Distance and Force=Mass x Acceleration and Acceleration=(change in velocity)/time. I am stuck at the acceleration part. As far as I am concerned my velocity is constant, so Acceleration=0 therefore Force and Work are 0. This doesn't seem right. What am I missing here?

share|cite|improve this question
It's because you have oversimplified the problem. In your explanation are effectively talking about a blob sliding on a flat, frictionless surface at constant velocity. The problem is far more complicated. – Will Jun 6 '13 at 16:24
Ok I got you. This is still oversimplified, but does it even make sense. Let Acceleration = (avg. velocity) / (1 sec). The thought behind this is every time you take a step your almost starting from a stop since your momentum is minimal. So each step you accelerate to your average velocity and a step takes about a second. – dan08 Jun 6 '13 at 16:36
Think for example about lifting your leg, does this require work? Dan08, what do you think? – Will Jun 6 '13 at 16:39
You confusion stems from two thing (1) the distinction between "physics work" and the colloquial "man, this is hard" meaning and (2) while the net force is zero your muscles must constantly provide a force to counter losses to friction in various guises. – dmckee Jun 6 '13 at 20:36
This "The thought behind this is every time you take a step your almost starting from a stop since your momentum is minimal." is not a good reflection of human locomotion which makes good use of momentum carried from step to step. – dmckee Jun 6 '13 at 20:38
up vote 6 down vote accepted

When it comes to modeling the human body and its movements it becomes a lot more complex, because you actually have to model the different components of your body and how they attribute to the system. Plus you are not traveling at a perfectly constant velocity when walking at a steady pace.

If you were to model the work done by the human body while walking, you obviously will consider more of the lower body. I would personally neglect what the upper body does, even though your back muscles help move the legs and arms help stability and the respiratory system. However you want to know the quantity of work done by your legs, essentially.

Essentially (and crudely) it would be modeled by a set of joints that represent your legs and a block of mass M (your weight in total), and there it just a series of statics problems where you may model the movement of S number of steps and you can quantify the work done by your legs per step, and don't forget friction.

share|cite|improve this answer

When we walk 3 forces act on us normal, gravitational and friction. For normal and gravitation force perpendicular to total displacement so by dot product rule work done is 0.and for static friction 0 displacement, when we displace we don't contact with ground so friction don't do any over all work done in walking is 0.

share|cite|improve this answer

protected by Qmechanic Nov 1 '13 at 10:26

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.