Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

How can be proved that terms

$$\frac{1}{|r_{i}-r_{j}|} $$

are the ones that avoid the existence of an analytical solution for the many electron atom problem

share|improve this question
    
Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/252/2451 and physics.stackexchange.com/q/37938/2451 Related classical problem: physics.stackexchange.com/q/1235/2451 –  Qmechanic Jun 6 '13 at 15:15
add comment

marked as duplicate by Brandon Enright, Waffle's Crazy Peanut, Qmechanic Jun 6 '13 at 19:13

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

1 Answer

I guess part of this depends on what you mean by the existence of an analytical solution...

If you mean "can it be written in terms of some convergent series of special functions?" then the answer is that nobody has found a set of special functions that are reasonably well-understood enough to be useful. That is, you could just proclaim a special function which solves the associated differential equation. This is what all special functions are, really. But if you don't know things like the eigenvalues, then this is rather pointless. The reason here is, ultimately, nobody's found a good representation for the solutions. Maybe you could -- if you could exactly solve Helium it would be quite the accomplishment!

If you mean "is there some complete set of commuting operators?" then this boils down to the integrability of the many-body problem. This has been a subject of interest for at least 200 years. This leads to a lot of interactions between the KAM theorem, quantum mechanics from a Lie algebraic perspective, regular versus chaotic dynamics, and a lot of really fascinating stuff. But the answer here might be "No, there is not a complete set of operators that have simultaneous eigenvectors with the Hamiltonian", or rather that there is no set $\{\mathcal{J}_i \}_N$ for $2N$ degrees of freedom such that

$[\mathcal{J}_i, \mathcal{H}] = 0 ~ \forall ~ i$

But there are approximate solutions. If you look in Sakurai for the helium atom, a variational approach works reasonably well at predicting the ground state energies including the inter-electron Coulomb repulsion. In THAT sense, there are analytical solutions. But all this depends on what you mean by "analytical solutions".

share|improve this answer
    
Hi, thanks for your answer. Could you give some references about the KAM theorem, Quantum Mechanics and Lie Algebras that you write about? Thanks. –  Jorge Jun 6 '13 at 17:14
add comment

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.