Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

enter image description here

I would like to put this into a differential equation. This is what I have.

$$r \times F = I \ddot\theta + \mu \dot\theta + k \theta$$

What I need verified:

  • $\text{Torque} = I\ddot\theta + \mu \dot\theta + k \theta$
    • $I$ = moment of inertia (constant)
    • $\mu$ = kinetic friction (constant)
    • $k$ = spring constant ( in my application it will be 0 ) (constant)
    • $\theta$ = rotation (function)
  • Torque = $r F$
    • $r$ = radius
    • $F$ = force
  • It's safe to set the two equations for Torque equal to describe the system.
  • That a solution to the differential for $\theta(t)$ will describe the rotation with respect to time of the circle cylinder.

Any insight would be much appreciated, thanks.

share|improve this question
2  
Patrick, we have the MathJax engine running on the site, which can render more attractive math from a LaTeX-alike syntax. –  dmckee Jun 3 '13 at 1:58
    
@dmckee Thanks, I'll use that in the future. –  Patrick Lorio Jun 3 '13 at 2:00
    
Note friction is usually applied at a radius, so you need $\mu r \dot{\theta}$. –  ja72 Jun 3 '13 at 5:12
add comment

2 Answers 2

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Is this the situation?

If yes then the friction force has to be proportional to the applied force $F$ and not $\omega$. With a perfectly relaxed rope, there is no contact and hence friction. What you include as a friction term is actually a rotational damper, which resists $\omega$. So you have a spring damper system with

$$ r\, F - k \theta - \mu \dot{\theta} = I \ddot{\theta} $$

a

share|improve this answer
add comment

In other words, you're asking whether it is correct to say that $\tau = I \alpha + \mu \omega + k \theta$ (where $\alpha = \theta ''$ and $\omega = \theta'$) in the specific case of us having a rigit object with torsion, kinetic friction and inertia. However, your equation frictional force is wrong: it should be $\tau_{friction} = \mu_k F_N r$ , where $\mu_k$ is the coefficient of kinetic friction, $F_N$ is the normal force. Yes, your general idea is true because $\tau_{effective} = \Sigma \tau$. Just as a side example, consider the case in which we have $n$ torques,

$$\Sigma_{i=1}^n \tau_i = \tau_1+\tau_2+...+\tau_n = (r_1 \times F_1) + (r_2 \times F_2) + ... + (r_N \times F_n)= \Sigma (r_i \times F_i) $$ In the case that $r= r_1 = r_2=...=r_n$, then our equation above simplifies to $\Sigma \tau = \Sigma (r \times F)$. Similarly, in your case we have 3 torques, $\tau_1$,$\tau_2$ and $\tau_3$ cause by three different things. However, the correct equation for your case is $\tau = I \theta'' + \mu_k F_N r + k \theta$. Note that the torque due to friction does not depend on $\theta$, $\theta'$ or $\theta''$.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.