Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have to find a constant of motion associated to this Hamiltonian but I don't know how to proceed.

$$H=\frac{\mathbf{p_0}^2}{2m}+\frac{\mathbf{p_1}^2}{2m}+\frac{\mathbf{p_2}^2}{2m}-2V(\mathbf{r_1}- \mathbf{r_0})+V(\mathbf{r_2}-\mathbf{r_1})$$

where $$V(\mathbf x)=\frac {e^2}{|\mathbf x|}.$$

I don't know what $\mathbf x$ is.

This Hamiltonian refers to a system of 3 particles $(0,1,2)$ with mass $m$ and charge $e$.

The coordinates are $r^\alpha_i$ and conjugate momenta $p^\beta_j$ with $\alpha, \beta=0,1,2$.

I have written all the information that I have.

share|improve this question
    
This may be of interest: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_bracket#Constants_of_motion –  sujeet Jun 1 '13 at 18:12
    
@sujeet yes, sure, but I don't know what function considering in addition to the Hamiltonian.. have you got any idea? –  sunrise Jun 1 '13 at 18:15
    
Just to be clear, since it looks like the potential is confusing you a little, the full Hamiltonian is like this: $$ H = \sum\limits_{i=0}^2 \frac{\mathbf{p_i}^2}{2m} - 2\frac{e^2}{|\mathbf{r_1} - \mathbf{r_0}|} + \frac{e^2}{|\mathbf{r_2} - \mathbf{r_1}|} ~. $$ –  sujeet Jun 1 '13 at 18:32
    
@sujeet Oh, thank you! I'd have never understood if you didn't write it :) –  sunrise Jun 1 '13 at 18:55
add comment

1 Answer 1

Use Poisson brackets. A constant of motion is some function $F(q_i,p_i)$ of phase space that is independent of time, i.e. such that $\frac{dF}{dt}=0$. Now, consider that $$\frac{dF}{dt}=\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{q}_1}\frac{d{q_1}}{d{t}}+\ldots+\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{q}_n}\frac{dq_n}{dt}+\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{p}_1}\frac{d{p_1}}{d{t}}+\ldots+\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{p}_n}\frac{dp_n}{dt}+\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{t}}\\=\sum_{j=1}^n\left(\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{q}_j}\dot{q}_j+\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{p}_j}\dot{p}_j\right)+\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{t}}$$ but since we defined $F=F(q_i,p_i)$ ($F$ doesn't depend explicitly on time), $\partial{F}/\partial{t}=0$, so that you may just calculate $$\sum_{j=1}^n\left(\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{q}_j}\dot{q}_j+\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{p}_j}\dot{p}_j\right)=\sum_{j=1}^n\left(\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{q}_j}\frac{\partial{\mathcal{H}}}{\partial{p}_j}-\frac{\partial{F}}{\partial{p}_j}\frac{\partial{\mathcal{H}}}{\partial{q}_j}\right)\equiv\left\{F,\mathcal{H}\right\}$$ which is the way the Poisson bracket $\{F,\mathcal{H}\}$ is defined. Note that your hamiltonian does not depend on time, so that immediately $\{\mathcal{H},\mathcal{H}\}=0$ and energy is conserved. This way you may look for other conserved quantities like linear momentum $p_k$ or angular momentum $L_k$, for example.

share|improve this answer
    
I'd like to not go at random... :) There is a way to analyze the simmetry of the system, of the Hamiltonian... and hypotize the constant of motion? –  sunrise Jun 1 '13 at 18:36
1  
A basic one is that if the Hamiltonian does not contain a particular coordinate $q_k$ explicitly, $p_k$ is a constant of motion ($q_k$ is called a cyclic coordinate), but again this may be justified by the Poisson bracket $\{p_k,\mathcal{H}\}$ (which you were supposed to see by yourself). There sure are other ways, but maybe even more contrived, as the Hamilton-Jacobi equations. Maybe you just have to get your hands dirty sometimes. –  Pedro Figueroa Jun 1 '13 at 19:12
    
Thanks a lot for your help. Now I try to explain better my problem: I'm not sure that the text of the exercise is complete or there's some missing information. (In this Hamiltonian there are all $q$s and so I can't find the constants..). This is a doubt that is driving me crazy! :) –  sunrise Jun 1 '13 at 20:26
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.