Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When I was in high school, my teacher did an experiment to show the power of atmospheric pressure.

Experiment: Prepare a glass bottle, fill with water, put a glass plate on the bottle, make sure there is no air in the bottle, just water. Hold the glass bottle and plate, and invert them. Slowly, release the hand which hold the plate. Because the atmospheric pressure, the glass plate will not fall down.

water in a cup holds a glass plate

Question 1: As we know, if we didn't put water into the glass bottle, just air in the glass bottle the glass plate will fall down. So, If we use other liquid instead of water, this liquid has smaller density than water, like alcohol, the plate will not fall down. But, if we continue to chose the smaller density liquid until the liquid has density like air the plate will fall down. So, if there is a threshold density of liquid make the plate between falling down and not falling down?

Question 2: If we put the bottle and plate into water slowly, when the plate and part of bottle are in the water but part of the bottle still above the water, will the plate fall down?

Question 3: Continuing question 2, when both bottle and plate are in the water I know the plate will fall down. So, how does the pressure of water and atmosphere change?

Is there a good description of this phenomena? Why does the trick continue to work with lower density fluids and why does placing the plate in the water cause it to fall?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 3 down vote accepted

There are two unrelated effects at work here. One is the atmospheric pressure, and the other is the surface tension of the water.

Start with you holding the plate in place, and consider what happens when you release the plate. For the plate to fall down one of two things must happen. Either the volume of the water in the glass must increase, to allow the plate to move down, or air must flow into the glass at the contact line between the glass and the plate.

Consider the first of these. If you pull the plate down slightly (and no air leaks in) the volume inside the glass must increase. Water has such a high bulk modulus that we can approximate it as incompressible. You would need an immense force pulling down on the plate to stretch the water to any significant degree. In practice the water would boil before its volume increased significantly, but even the lesser force required to boil the water is far greater than the weight of the glass plate.

So the only way the plate can move down is for air to leak in through the contact between the glass and the plate. However this means forming small bubbles at the contact line, and small bubbles have a very high pressure due to the surface tension at the air/water interface. This means the bubble formation requires a greater pressure than the weight of the plate can generate, so the plate can't move down this way either.

Incidentally, the effect of surface tension explains why the plate won't stick if the glass/plate contact isn't very good, or if there's a chip in the glass. In both cases there is a relatively large gap where a bubble can form, and large bubbles have a smaller pressure than small bubbles (the bubble pressure is inversely proportional to the bubble radius). The weight of the plate can generate enough pressure to form the large bubbles, and the plate falls off.

Now we can explain why the plate falls off when you immerse the glass and plate in water. If you do this there is no air/water interface at the contact between the glass and the plate, so there is no surface tension effect. Water can leak through even the tiniest gap between the rim of the glass and the plate so the plate falls off (though it may take a few seconds as the water won't flow in instantly).

The trick will work with most liquids because most liquids will neither expand nor boil under the weight of the plate. However it wouldn't work with very volatile liquids like ether, because ether boils too easily and vapour bubbles will form in the glass. You'd probably also find it wouldn't work if the air/liquid interface has too low a surface tension, because a low surface tension allows air to lean in between the glass and the plate.

share|improve this answer
    
Your answer has explained many things. and I also think the "small leak through the contact line" is the key in this experiment. So, the atmosphere pressure is the power to hold the plate, but only in the situation of liquid like water. –  JohnsonDiao Jun 1 '13 at 13:08
    
@John Rennie Just for extra clarity, where if at all does atmospheric pressure come into play? It seems this is moderated entirely by gravity, incompressibility, and surface tension. –  Chris White Jun 1 '13 at 13:42
add comment

QUESTION 1: I guess the different results with water and air are due to the difference in compressibility of water and air, rather than in their densities. When there is water in the bottle, a small deformation of the glass plate will result in small change of the volume of water in the bottle, which, however, will result in significant drop of pressure of the water, so the difference of pressure between the atmosphere and the water in the bottle will be enough to counteract the weight of the water and the glass plate. If there is air in the bottle, small deformation of the glass plate will result in a small change of air pressure, so the difference of pressure between the atmosphere and the air in the bottle will not be enough to counteract the weight of the glass plate.

share|improve this answer
    
+1 for water compressibility. But then the mass of the plate matters? What is the max mass before it falls? –  fffred Jun 1 '13 at 7:29
    
@fffred: To answer your question, one should consider the balance of forces acting on the plate.I may miss some details, but right now it seems to me that, for the plate to fall, its weight should be greater than the atmospheric pressure times (external) cross-section area of the bottleneck minus the pressure of the water column in the bottle times the (internal) cross-section area of the bottleneck. –  akhmeteli Jun 1 '13 at 14:18
add comment

A1: The pressure inside is hydrostatic $\rho g h$ plus the pressure of saturated water vapor $p_{sat}$, which is much smaller than the atmospheric pressure $p_a$ at temperature much below the boiling temperature of water, 100 C, so we neglect $p_{sat}$. Then the force balance will hold up to h~10 m which corresponds to $p_a \sim $ 100 kPa. For lower density liquid the height would be larger if $p_{sat}$ is still small. But low density liquids like alcohol tend to evaporate easily, so one should be careful if the vapor pressure can be neglected or not, depends on the temperature.

A2: Submerging the system slowly into water should not reduce the net force pushing the board to the bottle, actually the opposite - it would add external pressure on the board $\rho g H$. But in practice I think the board would quickly detach because the water would easily sip in from outside.

A3: Same as A2.

share|improve this answer
    
for A1, I have one puzzled, what's the meaning of "For lower density liquid the height would be larger". It's the same bottle,so the height is the same. –  JohnsonDiao Jun 1 '13 at 4:44
    
and for A2, how the water outside sip into the bottle? Is there a gap between board and bottle ? –  JohnsonDiao Jun 1 '13 at 4:45
    
For A1: The maximum height $h$ will be larger for lower density. For A2: In real system there will be always some leak, the board is not fitted perfectly to the bottle. When the whole thing is in the air the small leak will not do anything (surface tension will prevent water from escaping); but if there is water outside the leak will be enough for external water (which is at higher pressure) to sip in and equilibrate the pressure eventually. –  Maxim Umansky Jun 1 '13 at 5:18
    
The suggestion by John Rennie that the plate cannot move down without air bubbles penetrating in does not sound right. Just consider the case when there is no air outside - then the board would happily fall down since there is pressure from inside (hydrostatic + saturated vapor pressure) but zero pressure from outside. Water does not generate "immense" negative pressure if you try to expand it (which is I think what John Rennie suggests), if you force it expand it will not remain continuous like rubber but it will just form bubbles inside filled with saturated vapor. –  Maxim Umansky Jun 2 '13 at 4:39
    
I think the atmosphere pressure is the reason why water is liquid. In this system, gravity is the first power. and gravity make a atmosphere pressure become true. and atmosphere pressure make water become liquid. So if we want to do this experiment in vacuum, it can't succeed .because I guess all of the substance will blowout except solid. –  JohnsonDiao Jun 2 '13 at 5:19
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.