Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This question already has an answer here:

Special relativity says that anything moving (almost) at the speed of light will look like its internal clock has (almost) stopped from the perspective of a stationary observer. How do we see light as alternating electric and magnetic fields? Also does light never age?

share|cite|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Waffle's Crazy Peanut, Brandon Enright, Qmechanic Jun 1 '13 at 12:35

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Hi Zach. I think the the question has not been properly defined. Please have an introductory on Electromagnetism and especially Maxwell equations..! – Waffle's Crazy Peanut May 31 '13 at 16:14
Possible duplicates: , and links therein. – Qmechanic May 31 '13 at 20:12

The time stands still for light indeed, so it will never age.

You can think of the photon as a sine wave shaped electric field fragment traveling at $c$, and you can measure it's amplitude and frequency as it flys past your instrument. The photon itself does not oscillate.

(Bit oversimplified but probably you get the point.)

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 this is right but you might want to add how it's the source whose electric and magnetic fields are actually alternating as the photon is produced. Or something like that; just to increase clarity – Jim May 31 '13 at 16:37
@Jim: I think that would cause more confusion, as there is no sine wave shaped things that moving at $c$. Electromagnetic field oscillates locally and this disturbance propagates with $c$. Actually no movement here at all. Waves are tricky... If you can word your suggestion in a non-confusing manner, feel free to edit my answer. – Calmarius May 31 '13 at 17:31
Actually, what you just said to me was exactly what I was trying to suggest to you. Kudos for wording it much better – Jim May 31 '13 at 17:34

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.