Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In Weinberg's Gravitation,

the formula for the volume element in curviliniar coordinates is given by $$dV=h_1 h_2 h_3 dx^1 dx^2 dx^3.$$

The metric is given by $ds^2=h_1^2 dx_1^2+h_2^2 dx_2^2+h_3^2 dx_3^2.$

I am totally confused by this, I know that $\sqrt{g^{\prime}}=|\frac{\partial x}{\partial x^{\prime}}|\sqrt{g}$. If I take the initial metric to be euclidean, then clearly $\sqrt{g^{\prime}}=\det(J)$. The change in volume element is given by $dV=\det(J)^{-1}dV_{euclidean}$, which gives $dV=\frac{1}{h_1 h_2 h_3}dx_1 dx_2 dx_3.$

Where am I going wrong?

Also, the expression for curl, divergence etc have a factor of $\det(g)^{-\frac{1}{2}}$.

Why is this so? How do I prove it?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

You're confusing yourself with your own notation. Instead of writing $dV$ all over the place, let's keep it explicit as $dx^{1} dx^{2} dx^{3}$ and such.

Let $dx^1$ and so on be in cartesian and $dx^{1'}$ be for some other curvilinear coordinates.

Then you get $$dx^{1'} dx^{2'} dx^{3'} = (\det J)^{-1} \, dx^1 dx^2 dx^3$$

Just move the determinant to the left and replace with $h$'s.

$$h_1 h_2 h_3 dx^{1'} dx^{2'} dx^{3'} = dx^1 dx^2 dx^3$$

And that is correct. There's some ambiguity in the notation because it's common in vector calculus to say $dV = \sqrt{|g|} dx^1 dx^2 dx^3$, to treat $dV$ as an "invariant" quantity that merely has equivalent descriptions in various coordinate systems. For some reason this isn't done in GR, so the meaning is slightly different. (Or perhaps this is why some prefer to say $d^4 x$ instead.)

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.