Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

From string theory, the vacuum field equations obtain correction of the order $O[\alpha'R]^n$ such that they can be written as

$$ R_{\alpha\beta} -\frac{1}{2}g_{\alpha\beta}R + O[\alpha'R] = 0 $$

where $\alpha' = \frac{1}{2\pi T_s}$, when including just the first order term for example.

What is the physical interpretation of these corrections, what do they look like more explicitely, and how can they be obtained?

share|cite|improve this question
What exactly are the correction terms? Surely they cannot be scalors. – MBN May 28 '13 at 8:49
@MBN have just heard that there are such corrections, but I dont know how they look explicitely :-/. So I have put this into the question too. – Dilaton May 28 '13 at 8:53
Are these the corrections you get when you compute the effective action (to some chosen number of loops)? Having done that, you write down the "corrected" equations of motion. – twistor59 May 28 '13 at 9:16
@twistor59 you mean that one starts with some bare action at a high (around Planck) energy scale, the RG flows it down to a scale where classical GR can be applied, and the additional terms the effective action has obtained lead to these corrections of the corresponding EOM? – Dilaton May 28 '13 at 10:14
@Dilaton Sort of I think; I meant the stuff that's described in section 7.3.1 and 7.3.2 here – twistor59 May 28 '13 at 10:57
up vote 4 down vote accepted

As Witten explains in his NOTICES OF THE AMS article (please see also his more recent lecture), the fully quantum string theory is characterized by two coupling constants (or in the language of deformation quantization: two deformation parameters). The string coupling $g_s$ and the string tension $\alpha^{'}$. In perturbation theory, one gets dependence of the string amplitudes on powers of $g_s$ (or equivalently in $\hbar$) through the genus expansion.

The dependence of the amplitudes $\alpha^{'}$ is obtained once one takes into account that in the presence of background fields, the string Lagrangian is not free, it is described by a sigma model. If we compute the quantum correction to this sigma model we get terms with more and more derivatives multiplied by more powers of the of the string tension (as in chiral perturbation theory). When the quantum corrections to the trace of the energy momentum tensors are calculated then here also terms depending on powers of $\alpha^{'}$ will appear and the condition of vanishing of the beta function will results Einstein's equations with correction terms proportional to $\alpha^{'}$.

Please see equations 3.7.14. in Polchinsky's first volume, where the beta functions are given to the first power of $\alpha^{'}$.

Witten explains that for a while, the work on string theory concentrated on finding candidates of $\alpha^{'}$ deformed theories (as conformal field theories), then $\hbar$-quantize them as in ordinary quantum theory.

But, as Witten explains, after the discovery of the full set of string dualities and the role of membranes, it was realized that in order to fully quantize string theory, the two quantizations or two deformations($\hbar$, $\alpha^{'}$) must be perfomed together.

This route has profound consequences, for example, it leads to the conclusion that the string full quantum theory should be in the realm of noncommutative geometry, because in the presence of a $B$-field and brane boundary conditions, the position-position commutation relations will obtain $\alpha^{'}$ deformation and become noncommutative. As a consequence, the ordinary uncertainty relation will get $\alpha^{'}$ deformation and turns into a generalized (minimal scale) uncertainty, in which the position uncertainty has a nonvanishing minimum:

$\Delta x \geqslant \frac{\hbar}{\Delta p}+ \alpha^{'}\frac{\Delta p}{\hbar}$

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.