Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Why is Erbium Doped Fiber Amplifier (EDFA) preferred over Erbium Doped Waveguide Amplifier (EDWA)?

The question has been asked from an engineering point of view, but obviously I would also be interested in Physics of it. Is it just because of the difficulty of constructing a waveguide, or is there something more? I understand the individual benefits and limitations of a fiber amplifier and a waveguide but cannot understand the preference in this case.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_amplifier#Doped_fiber_amplifiers

share|cite|improve this question
    
I don't see what the difference is from a Physics point of view. Fibers are waveguides. From an Engineering point of view, it makes sense to distribute it along a fiber where the length can be adjusted instead of a silica/polymer flat waveguide which is a far less flexible support. – Anael Jul 15 '14 at 16:56

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.