Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

An object, mass $m$ is placed on an incline, angle $\theta$. System is at equilibrium. coefficients of static and kinetic frictions are $\mu_s$ and $\mu_k$ respectively. Then:

1) What is the Total contact force on the block by the surface??

2) Which are necessarily true?

a) $tan \theta$ is less than or equal to $\mu_s$

b) $f = \mu_s N$

c)$f= mgsin\theta$

My approach to 1)

total contact force will be $mgcos \theta$ (exerted by the incline as a normal reaction) + $\mu_s mgcos \theta$ (exerted by the incline in the form of friction) which are at right angles, result will be the square root of their squares, giving $mg cos \theta \sqrt{1+ \mu_s^2}$.

But the answer given is just mg!!! And the explanation is that total contact force = $mg cos \theta (= N) + mg sin \theta (= f)$ $\implies$ total force $= \sqrt{N^2+ f^2} = mg \sqrt{cos^2 \theta + sin^2 \theta }$

For 2)

I think all are right, except, $tan \theta = \mu_s$

but answer says b) is false!

Please help me!

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

Here we need to see that $$f\le N\mu_s= mg \cos\theta\ \mu_s$$

$N\mu_s$is the maximum friction that may be present in the surfaces,whereas here we need equilibrium.

The two forces along the incline must balance each other. So, $$f=ms\sin\theta \le \mu_s mg\cos\theta$$ If this inequality does not hold , ie. $$\tan\theta\le\mu_s$$

then the body will never remain in eqiulibrium. Now you can proceed !

share|improve this answer
    
why less than equal to? why not equal to? –  Saurabh Raje May 23 '13 at 12:15
    
$mgsin \theta = \mu_s mg cos \theta$ –  Saurabh Raje May 23 '13 at 12:16
    
$\implies$ $tan \theta = \mu_s$ –  Saurabh Raje May 23 '13 at 12:16
    
Because it is the maximum friction that can be applied. See the friction curve , (that increase linearly and then becomes constant).$mg\sin \theta = \mu_s mg \cos \theta$ is not always true. $\mu$ is the surface property and independent of $\theta$ –  Mr.ØØ7 May 23 '13 at 12:17
1  
@SaurabhRaje hmmmm. for equilibrium $f=mgsin\theta$ agree? –  Mr.ØØ7 May 23 '13 at 12:41
show 6 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.