Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The chemical potential is defined as: $$ \mu = -T\frac{\partial{S(N,V,E)}}{\partial{N}} $$ It seems to me that this is completely independent of where I put the reference point of energy, because only the difference of entropy is relevant (and also temperature is defined as a difference in entropy).

However the Fermi-Dirac distrbution is: $$<n_r> = \frac{1}{exp(\beta(\epsilon_r-\mu))+1}$$

But if I change the value of the reference point of energy, the value of $<n_r>$ changes, which causes a contradiction. In my book about statistical mechanics, they state though that $\epsilon_r-\mu$ is independent of the reference point of energy, but I see not why, because $\mu$ seems to be independent, while $\epsilon_r$ doesn't seem independent of the reference point.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Good question. I think that you're incorrect to assume the chemical potential is independent of the zero point.

I think it's easiest to see that the chemical potential must change by using $\mu = (\partial U/\partial N)_{S,V}$. Suppose I first define the zero point as 0 so that the energy is $U(N)$. Then I redefine the zero-point energy (for a particle) as $\epsilon_0$, so that $U' = U + N\epsilon_0$. Now,

\begin{equation} \mu' = \left(\frac{\partial U'}{\partial N}\right)_{S',V} = \left(\frac{\partial U}{\partial N}\right)_{S,V} + \epsilon_0 = \mu + \epsilon_0 \end{equation}

Then if $\epsilon_r' = \epsilon_r + \epsilon_0$, you have that $\epsilon_r' - \mu' = \epsilon_r - \mu$, i.e. the difference is independent of the zero point.

In fact, the formula $\mu = -T(\partial S/\partial N)_{U,V}$ doesn't imply that chemical potential is independent of zero point. If you change the zero-point energy, you must adjust the form of $S$ accordingly. For instance, you need to have $S(U=0) = S'(U' = N\epsilon_0)$ and so you see that $S'$ is different that $S$.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you! That solved the question. –  yarnamc May 23 '13 at 9:00

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.