Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

1) The bent rod $ABCD$ rotates about the line $AD$ whit a constant angular velocity of $90 rad / s$. Determine the velocity and acceleration of the vertex $B$ when the rod is in the position shown in Figure.

2) Determine the velocity and acceleration of the vertex $B$ assuming now that the angular velocity is of $95rad / s$ decreasing the rate of $380rad / s^2$.

enter image description here

My attempt was to apply the formula $\vec{v}=\vec{r}\times \vec{\omega}$ but I think it is not valid if the rotation axis is not aligned with any of the axes in the $xyz$ space. Maybe I'm talking nonsense. I was thinking about making a change coordinatas to the rotation axis coincide with the $z$ axis. But it seems very counterproductive and does not seem to be the purpose of the exercise.

share|improve this question
    
I think $\vec{v}=\vec{r}\times \vec{\omega}$ is perfectly valid. It doesn't depend on whether $\omega$ is aligned to a Cartesian axis. What you do need to find, is the proper $\vec{r}$. –  Evert May 17 '13 at 14:43
    
@Evert In this case would be the vector $\vec{r}$ is $\vec{OB}$? And the vector $\vec{\omega}$? –  Elias May 17 '13 at 14:48
1  
$\vec{\omega}$ would have the same direction as the rotation, so $\vec{AD}$. And $\vec{r}$ would be the distance relative to that axis, so $\vec{AB}$ (or $\vec{DC}+\vec{CB}$). However you could also calculate the projected distance from $B$ to the axis of rotation, in which case the angle between $\vec{\omega}$ and $\vec{r}$ would be zero so $\vec{r}\times\vec{\omega}$ would equal $\|\vec{r}\|\|\vec{\omega}\|$. –  fibonatic May 17 '13 at 15:09
    
I usually have it as $\vec{v}_B = \vec{v}_A + \vec{ \omega} \times (\vec{r}_B-\vec{r}_A)$ so I do not get the sign wrong. –  ja72 May 17 '13 at 15:23

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

Your angular velocity vector is

$$ \vec{\omega} = \Omega \frac{ \vec{r}_D - \vec{r}_A }{|\vec{r}_D - \vec{r}_A|} $$

where $\vec{r}_A = (0,0.2,0.12)$, $\vec{r}_D = (0.3,0,0)$, $\vec{r}_B = (0.3,0.2,0.12) $ in meters and $\Omega = 90\;{\rm rad/s}$.

Your velocity kinematics is

$$ \vec{v}_B = \vec{\omega} \times ( \vec{r}_B - \vec{r}_A ) $$

And acceleration kinematics

$$ \vec{a}_B = \dot{\vec{\omega}} \times ( \vec{r}_B - \vec{r}_A ) + \vec{\omega} \times \vec{\omega} \times ( \vec{r}_B - \vec{r}_A ) $$ $$ = \dot{\vec{\omega}} \times ( \vec{r}_B - \vec{r}_A ) + \vec{\omega} \times \vec{v}_B $$

From here you plug-and-chug.

share|improve this answer
    
I'm almost convinced of his answer. But because the direction is $r_D-r_A$ not the $r_A-r_D$? –  Elias May 18 '13 at 1:14
1  
OP says line is $A$ to $D$, therefore it is along $\vec{r}_D-\vec{r}_A$. –  ja72 May 18 '13 at 3:33

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.