Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I am trying to analyse the problem of sticking an aluminum piece to a stainless steel piece only with pressure. The holding capacity of the system is determined by the static friction between the two pieces.

To improve improve the holding capacity I would like to introduce a polymer layer between the two pieces.

My problem is that I am having trouble finding reliable values for the coefficient of static friction for:

  • aluminum-steel
  • aluminum-rubber-steel
  • aluminum-silicone-steel
  • ... and other polymer metal combinations

An example of the problems with the reliability of the numerical values are the steel-on-steel coefficient of static friction. The value is reported as follows:

Similarly the English language Wikipedia gives steel on aluminum as 0.61 which seems equally outlandish.

share|improve this question
    
have you checked the references wikipedia provides for this data? –  Jim May 17 '13 at 14:24
    
I prefer other sites as a sourcefor these kind of information, such as engineering toolbox: mobile.engineeringtoolbox.com/friction-coefficients-d_778.html –  fibonatic May 17 '13 at 21:56
    
@fibonatic, it looks like that's the source that Wikipedia cites for some of this data. –  Colin McFaul May 18 '13 at 2:33
add comment

1 Answer

Ultimately, I think the discrepancies you are seeing are due to differences in conditions. As you probably know, the conditions can change the coefficient of friction enormously. Polishing the metal will usually lower the friction, a lubricant will lower the friction, and the temperature will change the viscosity of the lubricant. I'm sure there are others.

My go-to reference for these sorts of things is the CRC Handbook. I have a copy of the 1965-66 edition in my office, and a copy of the 2005-06 edition at home. Unfortunately, the table of coefficients of friction does not have citations to the sources. To take your example of steel on steel, the older edition gives 0.58 for "clean" steel, and about 0.1 for steel that's been lubricated with any of several vegetable oils. The newer edition gives 0.78 for "dry" hard steel. And it can also be anywhere in between if the steel has been lubricated with (for example) benzene, an alcohol, an alkane, etc.

The CRC's are nice because they give some relevant details of the conditions (in this case, lubricant and temperature), and they usually give a citation to original literature with more details about the conditions; I'm a bit disappointed that they don't have the citations for this data. My experience is that the newer editions are usually more comprehensive than the older editions, but that isn't really the case here: these two editions have some overlap with each other, and each has some pairs of materials the other doesn't.

There might be a more specialized handbook that is better for this than the CRC, but this isn't my area, so I don't know what the handbooks would be. I should also point out that the set of materials called "polymers" includes both the low-friction PTFE (Teflon) and several adhesives, so you want to be careful with that.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.