Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

enter image description here

Like the order behavior shown in the image, is it due to the universality of some fundamental mathematic theory? Is there some general physics explanation for it?

- edit: This question comes after I read Terence Tao's talk on universality (pdf).

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 7 down vote accepted

I don't see much order on this particular chaotic picture.

What I see is some localized mass. The mass is localized because of the attractive force of gravity. Also, what we could see if you included an animation is that the galaxy is spinning. That's also why the shape resembles a disk. This increase of the spinning after the gravitational collapse - or clumping - is due to the conservation of the angular momentum, see

Why do galaxies and water going down a plug hole spin?

More generally, one could ask why many systems in Nature that contain many degrees of freedom often look simpler - for example why diamond looks so nice and clear even though it's a complicated bound state of many carbon atoms. There's simply not choice because there must always exist an expansion of the behavior of a system around an infinite number of building blocks. The number of mathematically possible, qualitatively different behaviors is limited, so Nature has to recycle them.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for the answer. But if the systems are chaotic, why there could not be large amount (infinite) of mathematically possibilities? – Z.Sun Mar 7 '11 at 22:09
Dear Z. Sun, when the resolution is high enough, the number of posisibilities is infinite, diverse, and huge. But when one describes it as a systematic expansion, the number of starting points is limited. – Luboš Motl Mar 9 '11 at 6:56

Systems containing more than 2 bodies have been proved to be chaotic (Poincarè solved an approach to this problem with perturbation theory, when the king of Sweden proposed a problem: Solve the Solar System movement). Surely, it's been proved that one cannot express the solution of the motion of even a 3-body system in terms of algebraic formulas and integrals.

According to classical mechanics, if you know a certain state of the given system, you'll know all the evolution of the system with time, forward and backward. But the problem is that the set of equations one must solve to determine the functions ruling the movement of all the system particles is chaotic. It means that, given an initial state, you CAN predict all the system trajectory, but the system is very sensible to a slight change on the initial state. This is called deterministic chaos.

If you want to threat the phase space of a system composed with many particles like a Lioville fluid, you'll get the Boltzmann Transport equation. Which also describes the behavior of a distribution of particles. But to derive Boltzmann equation in order to describe the system behavior, one needs to make an assumption about the collisions on the system, where you lose information from one collision to another (it's been a problem for a long time, now...). It results on random chaos.

The apparent order on the system comes from a dynamical competition between the forces acting among the system's components. You can call it "interaction". A common characteristic of chaotic systems is the competing of two forces. For example, take the Earth-Sun-Moon system. Acting on each body, you have 2 forces. The order which will arise from the system depends on the tune you make for the forces' intensities and directions. And you should take care with this tune, because the behavior resulting from it may be very different from what you expect, since the system is chaotic. In order to study this kind of problem, one may call upon a lot of recent tools developed since Poincarè approach to it, in the early XX century.

Sorry for my bad english!

Best regards!

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks for your answer. P.s. There is a post about some periodic solutions of N-body system. – Z.Sun Mar 7 '11 at 21:49
Such solutions are particular cases of the equations... Now, what solution is more probable (or what "order" has more probability to emerge, given a system that we don't know its initial state) is a question that I wouldn't know how to answer. You can come with tools from Statistical Mechanics to approach such a problem, describing the system in the canonical ensemble, for example, if you fixed the temperature of the system. – Girardi Mar 7 '11 at 21:55
Yes, I post the link just to show there are nice looking solutions. That is all. But if I understand Tao's argument correctly, he means that large amount of certain type of random operations will result system approaching to certain regular state (status...). I am not sure how to understand this. – Z.Sun Mar 7 '11 at 22:02

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.