Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

Can someone provide a derivation of the Biot-Savart law for electromagnetic induction? To be clear, $$ d\vec{B}~=~\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\frac{I d\vec{\ell}\times \vec{r}}{r^3}. $$

Is there a simple way to compute the magnetic field at a point between two Helmholtz coils, if the radii of the coils are the same and the current through each coil is the same?

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Qmechanic May 10 at 16:26

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

5  
What should the law be derived from? –  David Z May 16 '13 at 3:24
    
@DavidZaslavsky, From Ampere's Law, preferably. –  Reuben Stern May 16 '13 at 18:15
    
I consistant derivation would be interesting to see. This is a good conceptual question, I absolutely dont seevwhy 2 closevoters think this should be closed. –  Dilaton Jun 9 '13 at 7:33

2 Answers 2

In the static case you can solve Maxwell equations using a vector potential via the poisson equatuion for the magnetic potential.

$\Delta \vec A(\vec r)=-\mu_0 \vec J(\vec r)$

Using the Greens function for the Laplace operator yields the solution of this differential equation.

$\vec A(\vec r)=\frac{\mu_0}{4 \pi}\int d^3r' \frac{\vec J(\vec r')}{|{\vec r-\vec r'}|}$

Now we can calculate the B field via $\vec B = \vec\nabla \times \vec A$ and use the identity $\vec\nabla\times(\phi\vec A)=\phi(\vec\nabla\times(\vec A))-\vec A\times\vec\nabla\phi $. Additionally we have to calculate the gradient of the scalar function 1/|(r-r')|. This gives the Bio Savart law.

share|improve this answer
    
What is '$rot$'? Furthermore, I am not convinced that you can do what you have stated. I want to see the entire thing! –  Killercam May 16 '13 at 8:05
    
rot is the german word of curl, I'm sorry for that. Which point is not clear or what do you think I can not do? –  Noldig May 16 '13 at 8:16
    
I don't see how you can derive the full expression from what you have said... –  Killercam May 16 '13 at 8:23
    
@Killercam: you can get to the Biot-Savart law from Noldig's answer for the vector potential by using explicitely cartesian coordinates and vector basis. –  gatsu May 16 '13 at 9:14

It is an experimental law not derivable from other more basic laws

share|improve this answer
    
I think this is wrong. You can derive it directly from Maxwell equations, which are more fundamental from my point of view. –  Noldig May 16 '13 at 7:16
1  
And how do you think Maxwell equations have been obtained? I think from Coulomb and Biot-Savart laws! –  richard May 16 '13 at 8:29
1  
ok, historically you are correct. Let's say they follow from each other, or they are consistent. –  Noldig May 16 '13 at 8:50
    
OK,people! Historically, Biot-Savart's Law -> Maxwell Equations -> Special Relativity But, I think now, you'll all agree that Special Relativity is the most fundamental of them all. So, why not use Special Relativity to give derivation of Biot-Savart's Law? I think I might write an answer –  Cheeku Jul 11 '13 at 23:14

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.