Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This question already has an answer here:

I have read that it's not possible.

share|improve this question

marked as duplicate by Alan Rominger, Chris White, Qmechanic May 15 '13 at 15:39

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

Why minus? I faced with problem in sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0375960194909814 : <<even as a thought experiment a black hole itself cannot be divided into two or more subsystems>>... –  drobnbobn May 15 '13 at 12:25
Define what you mean by "dividing" a black hole and what do you mean by "parts". Do you want to separate the matter composing the black whole in two? At what distance? –  inovaovao May 15 '13 at 12:49
Possible duplicate: physics.stackexchange.com/q/45448 –  Johannes May 15 '13 at 15:25

1 Answer 1

It is not possible, assuming that all tools we could use are "normal" in some particular sense (that is, they agree with some energy conditions). That means, they are made of particles and fields that cannot travel faster that light, for one example. Everything physicists discovered so far is "normal" in that sense, and it is highly unbelievable that we would come across something not "normal" in the future.

But if, theoretically, we are allowed to violate those conditions, then the answer is "we don't know". GR solutions are not explored enough in that area. I mention that to say that there is one possible loophole, though unlikely.

share|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.