Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

What has gone wrong with this argument?!

The original question

A space-time such that $$ds^2=-dt^2+t^2dx^2$$ has Killing vectors $(0,1),(-\exp(x),\frac{\exp(x)}{t}), (\exp(-x),\frac{\exp(-x)}{t})$.

Given that $$\dot x^b\frac{\partial}{\partial x^b}(\dot x^a\xi_a)=0 \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,(*)$$ where $x^a=(t,x)$, $\dot x^a$ is the tangent vector to a geodesic and $\xi^a$ is a Killing vector, then $$a\exp(x)+b\exp(-x)+c\frac{1}{t}=0$$ where $a,b,c$ are constants.

So I tried directly using $(*)$. What I got are $$t\dot t\dot x=0\\ \exp(x)(2\dot t\dot x+t\dot x^2)=0\\ \exp(-x)(2\dot t\dot x-t\dot x^2)=0$$ for each of the Killing vectors given.

(Right so far?)

Then multiplying the last 2 equations by $t$ and using the first equation, I get $$\exp(x)t^2\dot x^2=0\\ -\exp(-x)t^2\dot x^2=0$$ So any linear combination of the 2 LHS's must vanish, giving $$\alpha\exp(x)t^2\dot x^2+\beta\exp(-x)t^2\dot x^2=0$$ for arbitrary constants $\alpha,\beta$.

Either I have gone wrong somewhere, or somehow we must have $$t^2\dot x^2=1+\frac{\gamma}{t}$$

Unfortunately, I can't see why it is so. Any insight? Thanks.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 0 down vote accepted

Let us denote \begin{align} \xi_1 = (0,1), \qquad \xi_2 = (-e^x, e^x/t), \qquad \xi_3 = (e^{-x}, e^{-x}/t) \end{align} Each of these killing vectors leads to a conserved quantity \begin{align} c_1 &= \dot x_\mu\cdot (\xi_1)^\mu = \dot x t^2 \\ c_2 &= \dot x_\mu\cdot (\xi_2)^\mu = \dot t e^x +\dot x te^x \\ c_3 &= \dot x_\mu\cdot (\xi_3)^\mu = -\dot t e^{-x} + \dot x t e^{-x} \end{align} From the first conservation equation we obtain $$ \dot x t = \frac{c_1}{t} $$ Plugging this into the second two gives \begin{align} c_2e^{-x} &= \dot t+\frac{c_1}{t} \\ c_3e^{x} &= -\dot t+\frac{c_1}{t} \\ \end{align} and adding them together then gives the desired result.

share|improve this answer
    
Thank you, josh. I have double-checked the question and I'm sure I have transcribed it correctly... –  Jill May 14 '13 at 23:19
    
ooooh! I got it now! :) Thanks for the hint! –  Jill May 15 '13 at 0:30
    
@Jill Yes! I found my mistake as well; I had, in fact, made an algebraic error. I edited the response; glad to be of service. –  joshphysics May 15 '13 at 0:52

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.