Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm trying to compute uncertainty for the density of the ball.

I measured its radius 6 times, so I was able to compute the stastistical uncertainty (we call it uncertainty type A, I don't know, if that's common used designation) and I knew accuracy of the micrometer, so I got standatd uncertainty (we call it Type B uncertainty) and made combined uncertainty, which is $4.3 \cdot 10^{-6}~m$.

Then I measured the weight of the ball, but only once and computed standard uncertainty (type B) as $0,29 \cdot 10^{-4}~g$.

Now I have this formula for the density: $\rho = \frac {m}{V} = \frac {m}{\frac 43 \pi r^3}$ and I need to find a way how to express uncertainty of this quantity.

Does anybody know how to do that?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

Take its differential form :

$$\mathrm{d} \rho = \frac{1}{4/3 \pi r^3} \mathrm{d}m - \frac{m}{4\pi r^4}\mathrm{d}r$$

The greatest variation in $\rho$ will be achieved when all the terms add positively

$$\delta \rho =\frac{1}{4/3 \pi r^3} \delta m + \frac{m}{4\pi r^4}\delta r$$

Factor of $-3$ appears as matter of integration. Which you can recast into

$$\frac{\delta \rho}{\rho} = \frac{\delta m }{m} + 3\cdot\frac{\delta r}{r}$$

This will be accurate if the uncertainties are small enough compared to the value.

Otherwise, you can use the more general formula. For a function $f(\{x_i\})$, where $x_i$ is a quantity you measured with an uncertainty $\Delta x_i$, then

$$\Delta f = \sqrt{\sum \limits_{i=1}^{n} \left(\frac{\partial f}{\partial x_i}\right)^2 (\Delta x_i)^2}$$

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 for both methods: Your relative error addition is corect if you multiply a factor of three to the radius term. It's from integration constant of $r^{-3}$ :) Brilliant error calculus. – Stefan Bischof May 17 '13 at 14:30
Thanks for spotting it. I was too quick :) – Mathusalem May 17 '13 at 15:44

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.