Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Could anyone explain what "extending the solution" beyond the past light cone means? Say, for example, if I have a metric (no coordinate singularities), how can I extend it to the outside of the past light cone?

Up to know, I only could find the extension argument in the context of Schwarzschild solution, where it seemed to be simply the procedure of removing a coordinate singularity. So what if I don't have a coordinate singularity, how do I show the extension of my solution? What mathematical techniques does "extending the solution" imply?

share|cite|improve this question
Could you give a reference for this: the metric defines the light cone, so in a sense it's already extended "beyond the light cone". Maybe you're referring to maximal analytic extension? – twistor59 May 10 '13 at 12:41
@twistor, yes I did look at that thread but as I mentioned in the question, it only concerns with re-writing the Schwarzschild metric so that no coordinate singularities appear. I thought more in this direction: if the construction was carried out on a particular patch (just the past light cone), how could I extend it beyond the past light cone, i.e. to see whether I could potentially hit the BH horizon or, in case there is no horizon, one hits a naked singularity – ConciseAndClear May 10 '13 at 12:49
can anyone help please? – ConciseAndClear May 10 '13 at 13:39
It's very hard to imagine your example of a past light cone being generated other than by taking a spacetime and saying I'm just going to look at the manifold inside the past light cone and ignore everything else. i.e. your past light cone has been defined by a restriction operation, in which case there's an obvious extension! I don't know of any algorithm for generating maximal extensions - if you gave me Schwarzschild, I'd never have "guessed" the Kruskal extension - it's a rather ingenious construction. – twistor59 May 10 '13 at 19:05

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.