Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

An electromagnetic wave (like a propagating photon) is known to carry it's electric and magnetic field-vectors perpendicular and each depending on the differential change of the other thus "creating" each other and therefore appearing in-phase and reaching their minima/maxima together. I'm interested to know whether there was any uncertainty as a principle discussed in the underlying principles of the Maxwell equations, like $\Delta E \Delta B \geq \hbar$. I appreciate links, hints and answers.

share|cite|improve this question
Classical, i.e. Maxwellian, Electrodynamics is a non-quantized theory, so it's not bound to have this kind a heisenberg-like uncertainty relation. QED have this kind of relation for Electromagnetic field amplitudes. Remember that you can have a electrostatic field configuration(think on a uniformely charged) sphere that have (classically) $\vec B=0$ in the whole space, and also you have a well defined $\vec E$ so both $\Delta E$ and $\Delta B$ are zero. Also remember that the electromagnetic field is a single object, in both classical and quantum electromagnetic theory. – Hydro Guy May 7 '13 at 15:03
@user23873 All right, I have to admit that classical mechanics always bothered me because of it's idiosyncratic assumptions. I think I'll have to have a deep look in a Feynman lecture of QED. – JuSchu May 7 '13 at 15:53

One can see the consistency with the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle by the definition of wavelength and frequency of the electromagnetic wave:

lamda*nu/c=1 where c is the velocity of light

Multiplying both sides by h and considering lamda as delta(x) and p=h*nu/c for a photon,



share|cite|improve this answer
Yes, @anna v, but still, within this uncertainty of the electromagnetic wave in itself (as a hole), I can not see whether it could be theoretically possible to detect the magnitude of the electric and the magnetic vector simultaneously. – JuSchu May 8 '13 at 10:19
the photon is an elementary particle, it has no E or B in the sense of classical EM wave. If you want to see how the classical wave is built up by an ensemble of photons see this blog entry… – anna v May 8 '13 at 11:54
Thx @anna v. I was just trying to glue this with the statement "The electric and magnetic fields of a single photon in a box are in fact very important and interesting", being part of a broadly accepted answer <a href = "… this question</a> concerning the work of Serge Haroche. I am willing and ready to read and to learn and the road to reality needs good shoes. – JuSchu May 8 '13 at 15:30
@mods. A wrong mini-Markdown formatting occured. My fault. Did I miss a preview function on comments before adding my wrongly formatted link to the comment? How can I fix it? – JuSchu May 9 '13 at 15:17
@dmckee there is a comment for mods here – anna v May 9 '13 at 19:16

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.