Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Where does the energy go when two photons interfere destructively at a point on a screen in Young's double slit experiment ?

share|improve this question
1  
If energy simply redistributes itself , then what is the explanation of this ? physics.stackexchange.com/questions/23930/… Anna v's answer ? –  nonagon May 3 '13 at 10:55
    
You might as well ask "Where does the energy go at the nodes of a vibrating string?". Answer: to places where the interference is not so destructive. –  dmckee May 3 '13 at 17:42
    
@dmckee What if it is destructive everywhere ? Answer: Energy stays in the very same places , but it changes to other forms . For example suppose I send 2 out of phase waves to a person . The person won't see the waves coming to him but will be getting the energy at the other end of the string. –  nonagon May 4 '13 at 5:22
    
" What if it is destructive everywhere ?" In general that's not how it works. You seem to be assuming that the classical description of E&M and the quantum description will give different results in a realm where they are both valid. They won't. They describe the same physics and where their regions of applicability overlap they give the same predictions. –  dmckee May 4 '13 at 6:07
    
@dmckee When I said destructive everywhere , I was replying in the context of string and not EM waves . Like you said for vibrating string . –  nonagon May 4 '13 at 7:10
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 1 down vote accepted

Each photon leaves its energy in the molecules of the screen. Destructive interference observed at the line x=1mm for example , means that the probability of finding a photon at x=1 is close to zero. Instead, the photon has very high probabiliy of depositing its energy at the construcive interference fringe.

share|improve this answer
    
Yes , supposedly , the YDSE happens adzactly according to what we predicted using probabilities, then there'll be no heat/energy at the dark fringes ? –  nonagon May 3 '13 at 12:45
    
Also , I'd very grateful if you could once have a look here and tell me if I am correct here or not ? Kindly read the transcript once . Sorry for wasting your time , but kindly read and tell me if there's something that I am understanding .chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/71/2013/5/1 –  nonagon May 3 '13 at 12:49
    
Yes, in a double slit expriment the dark fringe means no energy deposited there. Luboš Motl in his blog has a good formulation of how the individual photon fields build up the classical electromagnetic field motls.blogspot.com/2011/11/… . Sound is different. The energy of sound is propagated on the medium. EM needs no medium. –  anna v May 3 '13 at 13:14
    
But I think you wrote in that post in my question's comment ," when alignment was right , heat was observed at a region of dark fringe ?" –  nonagon May 3 '13 at 13:26
    
That was a possible hypothesis for total destructive interference, no bright fringes. a very special experimental setup, wired.com/wiredscience/2011/02/real-live-antilaser . I was exploring alternatives, and my answer was not popular."Or the truth is in between that the energy propagates and we can only see interference if the beams impinge on a medium, which will take care of energy conservation" –  anna v May 3 '13 at 16:55
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.