Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

$F^{\mu \mathcal{V}}$ is defined in

http://www.lecture-notes.co.uk/susskind/special-relativity/lecture-7/relativistic-lorentz-force/

How to show that $F^{\mu \mathcal{V}}$$F_{\mu \mathcal{V}}$, is a lorentz scalar and how to find its value in terms of vectors, Electric field (E), and magnetic field(B).

This is mentioned in properties (point number 3) in wikipedia article

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_tensor

How to prove that?

share|improve this question
4  
Jesus, the other letter in the superscript isn't a script $V$ but the Greek letter nu, spelled as backslash nu in TeX, just like $\mu$ is mu. $F_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$ is manifestly a Lorentz scalar because the indices are nicely contracted and $F_{0i}$ components are $E_i$, the electric field, while $F_{ij}$ for spatial $ij$ is $\epsilon_{ijk}B_k$, the magnetic field components. These are kind of basics of tensors and relativity and if you don't know them, it may be hard to isolate what you exactly need to be explained - there may be lots of it. –  Luboš Motl Apr 25 '13 at 9:31

2 Answers 2

Geometrically, there's a reason it's also called the Faraday bivector: bivectors represent oriented planes in spacetime, and the Faraday field is just a field of these oriented planes, all with magnitudes and orientations. $F^{\mu \nu} F_{\mu \nu}$ is just the squared magnitude of the Faraday field. This is no more exotic than talking about the magnitude of a vector.

share|improve this answer

It's really easy.

First use the definition of the Faraday Tensor: $F_{\mu\nu}\equiv\partial_{\mu}A_{\nu}-\partial_{\nu}A_{\mu}$, and then write down the same expression but in an another inertial system of reference, i.e. $F'^{\mu\nu}=\Lambda_{\ \alpha}^{\mu}\Lambda_{\ \beta}^{\nu}F^{\alpha\beta}$. And using the property of the $\Lambda$ matrix: $\eta_{\alpha\beta}=\Lambda_{\ \alpha}^{\mu}\Lambda_{\ \beta}^{\nu}\eta_{\mu\nu}$, you will get that $F'^{\mu\nu}F'_{\mu\nu}=F^{\mu\nu}F{}_{\mu\nu}$, i.e. $F^{\mu\nu}F{}_{\mu\nu}$ is an Lorentz invariant quantity. Then for expressing this in terms of the EM Fields, you should use the matrix expression of $F^{\mu\nu}$: let say $F$, in terms of the EM fields. And the quantity $F^{\mu\nu}F{}_{\mu\nu}$ is, in matrix terms, the trace of the matrix $FF^T$. i.e.

$$F^{\mu\nu}F{}_{\mu\nu}=Tr(FF^T)$$

------------------------Edited--------------------------

Now, we know that the interval $s^2:=x_{\mu}x^{\mu}$ must be Lorentz invariant, in other words if $x'^{\mu}=\Lambda_{\ \nu}^{\mu}x^{\nu}$ is the world line of a particle measured by an inertial observer that moves with velocity $\vec v=v \hat u_x$, where

$$\Lambda_{\ \nu}^{\mu}=\begin{pmatrix}\gamma & -\beta\gamma & 0 & 0\\ -\beta\gamma & \gamma & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}$$

then is must be hold that $$x_{\mu}'x'^{\mu}=x_{\mu}x^{\mu}$$ where we know that $x_{\mu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}x^{\nu}$ and the metric is $$\eta_{\mu\nu}:=\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0\\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1,-1,-1)=:\eta^{\mu\nu}$$ then we have that $$x_{\mu}'x'^{\mu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}x'^{\nu}x'^{\mu}$$ $$\eta_{\mu\nu}x'^{\nu}x'^{\mu}=\eta_{\mu\nu}\Lambda_{\ \alpha}^{\nu}x^{\alpha}\Lambda_{\ \beta}^{\mu}x^{\beta} $$ $$ \eta_{\alpha\beta}x'^{\alpha}x'^{\beta}=\eta_{\mu\nu}\Lambda_{\ \alpha}^{\nu}\Lambda_{\ \beta}^{\mu}x^{\alpha}x^{\beta}$$ i.e. the matrix $\Lambda$ must satisfy

$$ \eta_{\alpha\beta}=\eta_{\mu\nu}\Lambda_{\ \alpha}^{\nu}\Lambda_{\ \beta}^{\mu} \qquad (1)$$

Then using (1), $$F_{\mu\nu}=\eta_{\mu\alpha}\eta_{\nu\beta}F^{\alpha\beta}$$ and $$F'^{\mu\nu}=\Lambda_{\ \sigma}^{\mu}\Lambda_{\ \rho}^{\nu}F^{\sigma\rho}$$ we are going to show that $F'^{\mu\nu}F'_{\mu\nu}=F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}$ (here the order does not matter due to $F^{\mu\nu}$ is actually a scalar, the $\mu,\nu$ component of the matrix $F$). OK, then we have that $$F'^{\mu\nu}F'_{\mu\nu}=F'^{\mu\nu}\eta_{\mu\alpha}\eta_{\nu\beta}F'^{\alpha\beta}$$ $$ =\Lambda_{\ \delta}^{\mu}\Lambda_{\ \varepsilon}^{\nu}F^{\delta\varepsilon}\eta_{\mu\alpha}\eta_{\nu\beta}\Lambda_{\ \sigma}^{\alpha}\Lambda_{\ \rho}^{\beta}F^{\sigma\rho}$$ $$ =\left(\Lambda_{\ \delta}^{\mu}\Lambda_{\ \sigma}^{\alpha}\eta_{\mu\alpha}\right)\left(\Lambda_{\ \varepsilon}^{\nu}\Lambda_{\ \rho}^{\beta}\eta_{\nu\beta}\right)F^{\delta\varepsilon}F^{\sigma\rho}$$ $$ \equiv\eta_{\delta\rho}\eta_{\varepsilon\sigma}F^{\delta\varepsilon}F^{\sigma\rho}\equiv F^{\delta\varepsilon}F_{\delta\varepsilon}$$ So $$F'^{\mu\nu}F'_{\mu\nu}= F^{\delta\varepsilon}F_{\delta\varepsilon}$$

Here the indices are dummy (they are being summed over), so they don't have to match. So, in conclusion the quantity $F^{\mu\nu}F{}_{\mu\nu}$ (or $F{}_{\mu\nu}F^{\mu\nu}$ ) if is measured in any inertial frame, it would have the same value, i.e. it is an Lorentz invariant.

Finally I'll write down the part of the calculation of $F^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}$ in terms of the EM fields, but maybe later. You know, because of the time. But! You should read this question, I asked a few months ago the same, and here is the answer. Of course, if you have questions, ask us.

Clic here: Calculating electromagnetic invariant in matrix form

share|improve this answer
    
If you need more explicit expressions please tell me, I'll write them down. –  Anuar Apr 26 '13 at 0:12
    
Please Please write the explicit expressions . –  Jishnu Ray Apr 26 '13 at 5:11
1  
It's actually the same. –  Anuar Apr 26 '13 at 16:36
1  
@JishnuRay I just added some details. –  Anuar Apr 26 '13 at 18:03
1  
As an interesting far aside, you then have the proof that any quantity $H^{\mu \nu \xi ...}H_{\mu \nu \xi ...}$ is also Lorentz invariant, as long as the two quantities (called tensor) $H$ have the same indices. This is called a contraction in tensor calculation. The value of $F_{\mu \nu}$ in terms of the fields $E_{\mu}$ or $B_{\mu}$ are found using the definition $F_{\mu \nu} = \partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu} A_{\mu}$ with $A\equiv \left(\phi , \mathbf{A} \right)$ the potentials. –  FraSchelle Apr 26 '13 at 19:32

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.