Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Ok, I've stumbled onto what I think is a bit of a paradox.

First off, say you had some computer in a very fast(near light speed) centrifuge. You provide power to this computer via a metal plate on the "wall" of the centrifuge's container, so it works similar to how subways and streetcars are powered.

If the computer normally would consume 200 watts, how much power would it consume at say 1/2 of light speed? Would it consume 400 watts from our still viewpoint?

Also, what if you were to be capable of communicating with this computer? Would the centrifuge-computer receive AND transmit messages faster from our still viewpoint? I'm a bit lost in even thinking about it.

share|improve this question
    
The question is very vague. What does gravity have to do in any of this? Also, why would you think the computer would consume power differently if it's rotating? –  dbrane Mar 1 '11 at 0:06
    
@dbrane en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_time_dilation from my understanding, the faster you go(even in a centrifuge), the slower time gets. When "interfacing" a fast object with a slow object, what happens? –  Earlz Mar 1 '11 at 0:07
    
Surely you meant just relativistic time dilation (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation) and not the gravitational variety, since gravity doesn't affect your experiment. But I get what you're asking now, if you meant relativistic time dilation. –  dbrane Mar 1 '11 at 0:11
    
@dbrane, yea, you're correct. Had it by the wrong(more specific) name –  Earlz Mar 1 '11 at 0:17
    
Title corrected. –  Jerry Schirmer Mar 1 '11 at 0:26

4 Answers 4

One thing to be aware of is that the principle of relativity would not apply to this computer--rotating reference frames are not inertial, and therefore, will not be related to 'stationary' reference frames by simple Lorentz transformations. Also note that if there are any capacitors or anything along those lines in the computer, then they would be accelerating with respect to a rest frame, and this acceleration would produce electromagnetic waves (and even failing this, accelerating current-carrying wires would have a similar effect), which would create a potentially measurable difference between the frame of the computer and the rest frame.

My instinct for this problem, though, is that the power consumption of the computer would go down, not up--the computer uses energy in its rest frame, which has a slower clock than the lab frame. So, it would go on using 200 J every second of ITS proper time, which would correspond to more time in the lab frame.

share|improve this answer
    
I wonder though if the electromagnetic radiation from the accelerating charges in the wires would carry off enough energy necessitating the computer to draw more power and this overcomes the difference between the 'dilated power consumption' and the power consumption at rest? It seems the acceleration would be effectively increasing resistance in the wires. –  jaskey13 Mar 1 '11 at 1:06
1  
@jaskey13: maybe, it would certainly be a source of energy loss. But disturbing the electrical balance of the computer this way could just as easily break it. –  Jerry Schirmer Mar 1 '11 at 2:45
    
it is interesting though to ask how current would flow through such regions –  jaskey13 Mar 1 '11 at 3:01
    
I'm a little confused by the answer - to me there seems to be a small algebra mistake. See my answer - maybe the mistake is mine. –  dbrane Mar 1 '11 at 17:02
    
You're right, my answer isn't correct. Deleting. –  dbrane Mar 1 '11 at 23:53

If you want your computer to run fastest, leave it at rest ;-).

share|improve this answer
    
or speed up everything else and leave the computer at rest talk about increasing bus speed –  Argus Jul 1 '12 at 18:46

A rotating frame has some similarities with special relativity, but since it is an accelerated frame it is not SR. To describe rotating coordinates consider the transformation between frame $F$ and $F^\prime$ $$ x^{\mu\prime}~=~{\Lambda^{\mu}}_\nu x^\nu, $$ In cylindrical coordinates the radial and azimuthal coordinates are $r^\prime~=~r$ and $z^\prime~=~z$ and $$ t^\prime~=~\gamma(t~-~\Omega\chi^t),~\theta^\prime~=~\gamma(\theta~-~\Omega\chi^\theta), $$ where $\gamma$ is the Lorentz factor. The angular velocity $\Omega$ gives the tangential velocity $v~=~\Omega r$ as measured by a nonrotating observer. The rotation in these coordinates is $$ \eta~=~{{d\theta}\over{dt}},~\eta^\prime~=~{{d\theta^\prime}\over{dt^\prime}}, $$ where in the rotating frame is given by $$ \eta^\prime~=~\frac{d\theta~-~\Omega\Big(\frac{\partial\chi^\theta}{\partial t}dt~+~\frac{\partial\chi^\theta}{\partial\theta}d\theta\Big)} {dt~+~\Omega\Big(\frac{\partial\chi^t}{\partial t}dt~-~\frac{\partial\chi^t}{\partial\theta}d\theta\Big)}. $$ Define the velocities $v~=~r\eta$ and $v^\prime~=~r\eta^\prime$, for $\chi^t~=~\theta$ and $\chi^\theta~=~t$. This gives a formula for the addition of rotation $$ \eta^\prime~=~{{\eta~-~\Omega}\over{1~-~r^2\Omega\eta/c^2}}, $$ which is analogous to the linear equation for velocity additions.

The metric for a rotating frame is then $$ ds^2~=~dt^2~-~r^2\Big(d\theta~+~{\Omega\over c} dt\Big)^2~-~dr^2 $$ or $$ ds^2~=~\Big(1~-~\frac{r^2\Omega^2}{c^2}\Big)dt^2~-~r^2d\theta^2~-~2r^2\frac{\Omega}{c} d\theta dt~-~dr^2. $$ The horizon for any observer on the rotating frame exists at $r~=~c/\Omega$. A solution to these coordinates with $dr~=~0$ according to the proper time $s$ is found to be $$ t~=~ g^{-1}\sinh(gs),~\theta~=~{{g^{-1}}\over r}\cosh(gs)~-~g^{-1}{\Omega\over c} \sinh(gs), $$ where $g~=~{{\Omega^2r}\over\sqrt{1~-~\Omega^2r^2/c^2}}$ is the acceleration parameter.

A rotating frame has a sort of event horizon, a Rindler wedge horizon $r~=~c/\Omega$. However, this is on the frame, so if you send photons along a radially directed fiber optic they get sort of trapped there a bit like a black hole. If you send them along a free path then there is no horizon. This is also related to the Sagnac effect, where sending photon pulses along a circular fiber optic in both directions results in one group returning before the other, or in an actual measurement a phase shift.

share|improve this answer

The clock speed is reduced by the amount of the Lorentz factor. The waste heat is more energetic by the amount of the Lorentz factor. So the power that the computer draws is unchanged.

When speed is 0.8 c, waste heat photons that have two times the normal energy are produced at rate that is half of the normal rate.

There is an important point missing in this answer: Let us consider a laptop. When we accelerate the laptop to relativistic speed, it takes some energy to accelerate the energy in the laptop battery. When this relativistic laptop computes, the kinetic energy of the chemical energy in the battery turns into kinetic energy of waste heat.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.