Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Was it the Big Bang or was it something else that gives us our universe in its present condition?

Did it all begin with just pure energy that eventually evolved into simple atoms of matter, that themselves evolved again into more complex structures similar to the way living organisms have evolved?

share|improve this question
2  
More on pure energy: physics.stackexchange.com/q/9731/2451 –  Qmechanic Apr 17 '13 at 0:50
2  
They're not mutually exclusive. All "matter" is energy. Not all forms of energy are "matter" though. –  Nick Apr 17 '13 at 2:04
    
This is a purely philosophical question. –  Sklivvz Apr 17 '13 at 8:34
1  
@Sklivvz: Actually it's a simple confusion about the difference (non-difference) between energy and matter. The first part is philosophical, though. I won't close it right now, unless others feel it ought to be as well :) –  Manishearth Apr 17 '13 at 9:00
1  
@Sklivvz: ...meh. Sometimes we get questions with false assumptions. Addressing the assumption effectively solves the question, so no biggie. (We can discuss this in chat if you want) –  Manishearth Apr 17 '13 at 9:06

1 Answer 1

The problem with your question is that the word energy is poorly defined. People tend to use it in a somewhat vague sense of not meaning matter, but this isn't a useful definition. For example, would you say photons were energy? If so, you would be at variance with most physicists who regard them as just another massless field along with e.g. gluons. In fact at times earlier than the electro-weak transition all particles were massless. However we wouldn't say that all the particles had become energy.

Using experimentally tested theories (i.e. the standard model) we can only go back as far as the electroweak epoch. During this period the same particles we see around us today were present, though the photon and weak gauge bosons had mixed to become electroweak gauge bosons. During this period all particles were massless. Working back in time there may be transitions due to supersymmetry breaking, unification with the strong force and eventually unification with gravity, but we have no universally accepted theories of these. However we expect that there would still be fields correspond to what we think of as particles, right up to possible transition to string theory. At no point would we describe the universe as just being energy.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.