Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider two bodies orbiting each other.

As the Universe expands would the distance between them increase?

Most people say that a gravitationally bound system will not expand with the Universe. They say that such a system is not described by the FRW solution.

But surely one could consider two orbiting bodies that are sufficiently far away that the spacetime between them could be approximately described by the FRW solution? In this case the recession velocity would be of the same order as the orbit velocity.

share|improve this question
    
Answers will essentially be duplicates of physics.stackexchange.com/q/2110/2451 and links therein. –  Qmechanic Apr 16 '13 at 16:41
2  
@Qmechanic I think that question and its links are all focused on expansion vs. electromagnetism, whereas this is gravity vs. gravity, so it's a somewhat different beast of a question (even if the answers run parallel). –  Chris White Apr 16 '13 at 16:51
    
@ChrisWhite I remember answering a question very close to this (and not the one that Qmechanic links), but I"m too lazy to look it up right now, too. –  Jerry Schirmer Apr 16 '13 at 16:57
add comment

1 Answer

The short answer is that cosmic expansion can affect orbits, but the actual effect is completely undetectable for solar system parameters (I think it was below machine error when I did it numerically). For sufficiently large cosmic expansions, you actually don't even have stable orbits anymore.

There are a large number of potential models to describe asymptotically FRLW black hole spacetimes, and it is somewhat unclear which model is the correct choice. I can point you to references if you wish.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for the answer. I suppose I was thinking in a naive way that Newtonian attraction causes the two bodies to accelerate towards each other whereas Hubble expansion causes them to have a relative velocity. I thought perhaps a solution would be a simple sum of these two effects. –  John Eastmond Apr 16 '13 at 17:25
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.